On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Ionut Gabriel Stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But wouldn't be useful to at least accept objects implementing ArrayAccess?
sounds like a good idea to me > > On 10/23/2008 23:40, Mark van der Velden wrote: >> >> Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I notice that 5.3 differs from 5.2 in how array_key_exists treats >>> objects. In 5.2, if the second parameter (array) is allowed to be object >>> and HASH_OF is applied to it. However, in 5.3 it would produce a warning >>> requiring an array if object passed to it. Was it intentional? >>> Maybe the problem is deeper and is in zend_parse_arg_impl where it >>> should allow objects for 'a' if we can have HASH_OF from them? >>> >> >> To my understanding, it's superseded by the function property_exists. >> Also notice the difference of argument order. >> >> As written here: http://docs.php.net/array_key_exists >> >> >> > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
