Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Idea for namespace lookup resolution

2007-12-18 Thread Jessie Hernandez
Attached is a patch implementing my proposal. Basically, when inside a namespace, you must reference global classes using ::globalName or by having a "use ::globalName" statement. This allows classes inside namespaces to have the same name as internal ones without the need of explicitly "use"-

Re: [PHP-DEV] Will pay for fixes for bugs in PDO/PDO_ODBC

2007-12-18 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Wez Furlong wrote: > Your statement is not accurate: > http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/CVSROOT/avail?r1=1.1200&r2=1.1201 > > This should not be a blocker to anyone that wants to take this up. Missed that it was "removed" already. However, having a "restriction" in the first r

Re: [PHP-DEV] Will pay for fixes for bugs in PDO/PDO_ODBC

2007-12-18 Thread Wez Furlong
Derick, Your statement is not accurate: http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/CVSROOT/avail?r1=1.1200&r2=1.1201 This should not be a blocker to anyone that wants to take this up. I've been too busy to help Travis (I'm really sorry about that Travis), and I'm happy to share the pending fix with anyone

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Making sure it is ifdef'ed nicely would let us leave it in CVS until we get it right and if it causes problems for some people they have a way Why we need non-working code in main CVS ifdef'ed if we can use perfectly good CVS branch functionality? Just to make life harder to ourselves and the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Putting it into CVS into a good idea, but lets create a revert point via a tag, so we can always easily "undo" the patch if need be. Along with undoing all patches on the way done by other people for othe reasones. People, what's going on? Branches function in CVS is created EXACTLY for this u

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Making sure it is ifdef'ed nicely would let us leave it in CVS until we get it right and if it causes problems for some people they have a way to build PHP without it. And yes, that means their build won't be binary compatible, which is fine and no different from them trying to revert the patch th

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
Putting it into CVS into a good idea, but lets create a revert point via a tag, so we can always easily "undo" the patch if need be. On 18-Dec-07, at 10:05 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Dmitry Stogov wrote: Derick Rethans wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Dmitry Stogov wrote:

RE: [PHP-DEV] Will pay for fixes for bugs in PDO/PDO_ODBC

2007-12-18 Thread Andi Gutmans
PDO_ODBC is not the base which IBM is maintaining (theirs is PDO_IBM). They are usually very responsive to issues (at least in my experience). Looks like currently Wez is maintainer for PDO_ODBC. Andi > -Original Message- > From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Uhm I meant 5.3. I guess we can commit it but as you know, reverting this kind of stuff later is a headache people don't like doing. Life's not always easy ;-) So why again life should be not easy for all PHP tree users and not only for 3 people that work on the specific patch? CVS has branch

RE: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Derick Rethans wrote: > > > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > > > Derick Rethans wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe we just should put it in cvs then? Then we won't have this > > > > issue and other people can test it more easily as well. > >

RE: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Andi Gutmans
Uhm I meant 5.3. I guess we can commit it but as you know, reverting this kind of stuff later is a headache people don't like doing. With this patch it's not too bad because besides the macros which are committed already it's mostly isolated. Only enough testing by people on the list will be abl

RE: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Derick Rethans wrote: > > > > Maybe we just should put it in cvs then? Then we won't have this issue > > and other people can test it more easily as well. > > The only problem with that is what if people get bad > benchmarks/results and we want to pull

RE: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Andi Gutmans
> -Original Message- > From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 7:06 AM > To: Dmitry Stogov > Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch > > Maybe we just should put it in cvs then? Then we won't have this issue

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Alexey Zakhlestin
On 12/18/07, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe we just should put it in cvs then? Then we won't have this issue > and other people can test it more easily as well. +1 I want to test it, but, usually, messing with large patches is too time-consuming :-( having it in CVS will give m

Re: [PHP-DEV] Will pay for fixes for bugs in PDO/PDO_ODBC

2007-12-18 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Travis Raybold wrote: > I've been trying to find someone who could help me with a fix for a few bugs > in PDO_ODBC, and had no luck so far. I am more than happy to compensate > someone for the time spent fixing these bugs. Unfortunately it is not that easy as it seems. For so

[PHP-DEV] Will pay for fixes for bugs in PDO/PDO_ODBC

2007-12-18 Thread Travis Raybold
Howdy, I've been trying to find someone who could help me with a fix for a few bugs in PDO_ODBC, and had no luck so far. I am more than happy to compensate someone for the time spent fixing these bugs. One is bug #36561 (http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=36561

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > Derick Rethans wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > > > > > Didn't I send it to you? > > > > Maybe, maybe not :) I couldn't find it atleast. > > I just tried to apply this to PHP 5.3, but it gives lots of failed chucks... > > Are you

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Dmitry Stogov
Probably I've changed ZE after the patch was done :( I'll rebuild it, but not today. Dmitry. Derick Rethans wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Dmitry Stogov wrote: Didn't I send it to you? Maybe, maybe not :) I couldn't find it atleast. I just tried to apply this to PHP 5.3, but it gives lots of f

Re: Fw: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: dharmap

2007-12-18 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Dharmanna, your account is activated :-) marcus Tuesday, December 18, 2007, 6:01:12 AM, you wrote: > Another reminder for CVS id . > I have been working with Raghubansh Kumar & Zoe Slattery. Some of my test > cases have already been committed with the help of Raghubansh. I have been >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

2007-12-18 Thread Derick Rethans
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > Didn't I send it to you? Maybe, maybe not :) I couldn't find it atleast. I just tried to apply this to PHP 5.3, but it gives lots of failed chucks... Are you sure this is the one against 5.3? regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl