David,
You are right, classes that don't use self might break, although there might
be a solution for this: when a class declaration is started, immediately
"import" the class. This will fix the problem, but I don't really think
it's necessary. After all, if you're using an new feature as namespac
For previewing purposes, I have attached a patch of what I have so far so
that others can look at it and try it out. I have also attached two PHP
files for testing (_testns.php is the script that should be run after the
patch is applied. This script includes a class from class3.php to
demonstrate t
Dear all,
I came across something when I found this bug
(http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33621).
Should is_callable() and method_exists() always return true when the
method doesn't *really* exist? i.e. it would only be called via __call()
Is it possible to add an argument to make it only che
One more thing, here's an example of how things go in the enterprise and
where namespaces make or break PHP being used.
Every now and then, someone says "Let's merge projects A and B", and
those projects could be in different parts of the world, each having 10s
if not 100s of developers, and very
I think we're trying to boil the ocean here, and in doing so failing to
see both the problems that need to be solved, and the possible
solutions. I'd like to break things down a little bit here to address
what the real problem is with a lack of namespaces in PHP.
In my eyes, there are really only
JH>>With the above scenario, nothing will be affected if there is an
JH>>opcode cache or not. The only situation I can think of where an opcode
JH>>cache can affect this is when the script DYNAMICALLY creates classes
JH>>from the imported namespace. Maybe there's other situations, but I
JH>>can
Since the underlying way of passing internal data would be an object,
the functions you propose may as well be object methods. Aside from that
the API looks good.
Ilia
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Pierre-Alain,
since we now have ext/date shouldn't we rename pecl/date to
something different for easier integration? And i also do not
know if we aren't running into problems later if two extensions
have the same name.
marcus
Friday, July 8, 2005, 12:44:45 PM, you wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Ju
Hello Derick,
Friday, July 8, 2005, 2:31:14 PM, you wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
>> I would love to be able to do something like this:
>>
>> $d = new Date(time());
>> $d->month++;
>> $d->print("Y-m-d"); // date() equiv.
> Adding methods is no problem, that's what you get
At 02:36 PM 7/8/2005 +0200, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:31:14 +0200 (CEST)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
>
> > I would love to be able to do something like this:
> >
> > $d = new Date(time());
> > $d->month++;
> > $d->pr
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:31:14 +0200 (CEST)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
>
> > I would love to be able to do something like this:
> >
> > $d = new Date(time());
> > $d->month++;
> > $d->print("Y-m-d"); // date() equiv.
>
> Adding methods is
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> I would love to be able to do something like this:
>
> $d = new Date(time());
> $d->month++;
> $d->print("Y-m-d"); // date() equiv.
Adding methods is no problem, that's what you get for free anyway, I
just think that $d->month is too much magic, and
On Friday 08 July 2005 02:17, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
[snip]
> This is what I talk about when I say a common Date object in php.
> Derick exported the headers on my demand, this is a good first step.
I agree that it would be a great idea to have a common Date object in PHP. And
since most of it
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:16:29 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derick Rethans) wrote:
> Objects are not harder to implement, I found it actually more
> straight forward. Besides that, making it an object allows other
> people to extend it, something that Pierre wants for his pecl/
> date.
I do not
OK, I see what's going on here. The downloads page is just bad...
It says "there are no extensions in the installer" and it also says "the
extensions are available in the pecl download"
Whereas in fact the pecl download does not include all the extensions
that are not available in the instal
Regardless, you need to download the ZIP that is clearly stated on the
downloads page. The installer contains no additional modules, this is
also clearly stated. This question should have been posted to
php.general or php.install, not internals.
Nicholas Telford
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> The other are only duplicated with current function. This is maybe
> useless. The worst being to rely on strtotime to manipulate date,
> this is maybe human readable (understandable is another
> question ;), but it is slooow, and the best way to hell
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> If you're just wrapping the date type with a class, I don't see why it
> shouldn't be a resource. It'd give you the same thing but would be easier to
> implement (unless I'm missing something).
Objects are not harder to implement, I found it actually more
18 matches
Mail list logo
