Hello internals,
If anyone has a moment to answer this, it'd be appreciated...
--
isset($x); => false
is_null($x) => Notice: undefined variable $x
--
$x = null;
isset($x); => false
is_null($x) => true
The question is *why* does isset() report false on a variable that
is se
I will definitly keep that in mind :)
Thanks for eveybody's comments I appreciate the guidence. Hopefully I
can actually produce something that isn't an insult to the community and
can actually be considered a contribution. :/
Jess
-Original Message-
From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Hi,
I'd like to roll 5.0.3RC2. If you have any pending fixes please commit them
within the next 24 hours. I think this will be the last RC before releasing
5.0.3.
Ilia is also going to be rolling RC2 for 4.3.10 soon (I think)
Andi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubs
If all return paths return bool, then yes. Otherwise, no. (now that's a
boolean way to put it :)
Andi
At 09:09 PM 12/4/2004 +1100, Dave Barr wrote:
Hi Rasmus, noticed a proto problem with this commit.
You have the function proto returning an array:
> +/* {{{ proto array apache_reset_timeout(void)
You can lower the changes by supplying a unified diff :)
Andi
At 11:35 AM 12/3/2004 -0500, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Binam, Jesse wrote:
> Let me rephrase that. This is my first contribution to php or any open
> source project for that matter, and I have no idea what the
Hi Georg,
When we nuked the garbage collector this behavior was accidentally changed.
I think it should be fixed in the Zend Engine so that extensions stay
source compatible in between versions as much as possible.
Will look into it.
Thanks,
Andi
At 05:14 PM 12/3/2004 +0100, Georg Richter wrote:
I believe that there was an all around agreement and this and given that
we are nearing release of 5.0.3 and 4.3.10 this would be a perfect
opportunity to do it. Otherwise it'll need wait for unknown number of
months till the next release.
Ilia
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
On Dec 7, 2004, at 10:45 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
Did we ever came to the conclusion whether we should put this patch
into
CVS. AFAIK everybody agreed with it...
That's what I recall as well.
George
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 06:31:56AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >
> > There is already a --without-pic/--with-pic flag that just doesn't work.
> > I'd key it off of that.
>
> It doesn't work because PHP prevents AC_PROG_LIBTOOL from interpreting
> it by do
There's a README.SUBMITTING-PATCH file in the PHP source that gives a
fair amount detail on the preferred way to contribute to the project.
It boils down to submitting a patch (unified diff) against HEAD of CVS
to the internals list and CC'ing it to the appropriate extension
maintainer(s) (there i
10 matches
Mail list logo
