Derick
It's entirely likely I've made a mistake somewhere in that list, you're
welcome to perform your own tests.
They're gone, thanks for providing spam-bait to those address ;-)
Any chance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
could be barred on php.install
Copies of
RE: CST156916512ID - Fax Message Received
out num
Thanks for replying
Understood, but do you agree with me that the manual have a better
chance to give a wrong idea than the right one on this?
And that is giving me second thoughts about how bad it would be to
change stripslashes.
I think the manual could imply 2 things:
a) stripslashes should o
- Original Message -
From: "George Schlossnagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > very quickly. On the other hand I think the focus of people on this
> > list right now is a bit different from what you're trying to do: Fix
> > bugs in PHP 4 and get PHP 5 out of the door.
On that note, I'd like t
On Jun 10, 2004, at 5:42 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Alexander Valyalkin wrote:
Today I wrote the new version of strip_tags().
It looks like you're very eager to contribute to PHP and write code
very quickly. On the other hand I think the focus of people on this
list right now is a bit differe
Alexander Valyalkin wrote:
Today I wrote the new version of strip_tags().
It looks like you're very eager to contribute to PHP and write code very
quickly. On the other hand I think the focus of people on this list
right now is a bit different from what you're trying to do: Fix bugs in
PHP 4 and
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Andre Cerqueira wrote:
> > But the manual doesn't say that it *only* removes slashes
> > added by addslashes.
>
> "Returns a string with backslashes stripped off. (\' becomes ' and so
> on.) Double backslashes (\\) are made into a single backslash (\)."
>
> Yes, it doesn'
> But the manual doesn't say that it *only* removes slashes
> added by addslashes.
"Returns a string with backslashes stripped off. (\' becomes ' and so
on.) Double backslashes (\\) are made into a single backslash (\)."
Yes, it doesn't *say*, but i think anyone could see that implied if one
did
My reason is actually to submit to a PEAR module I have just been added as a developer
to. DB_DataObject_FormBuilder. I have talked to Markus Wolff (the package lead) and
he's ok with my commiting to CVS for this package.
The username listed below is my PEAR username.
--
PHP Internals - PHP
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:33:13 +0300, Alexander Valyalkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Today I wrote the new version of strip_tags().
Yes, it is not ideal, but it is much better than current version.
Below is my complete version of strip_tags() with testcases. You can add /
change
any testcases an
it's in the comments of the manual, but not in the actual manual text.
*why* won't it be fixed in 4.3?
Wez Furlong wrote:
The problem is linkage; for some reason, someone (in group@ ?) decided that
they didn't want to link the php core to openssl in the windows builds, and in
php 4.3 you can't use
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Stefan Esser wrote:
> this is not directly releated. I looked into addslashes yesterday and
> thought that it would be much better to scan the string 2 times. The
> first time to find out how much extra bytes one needs, and the second
> time to do the actual replacing. So we
Hi,
this is not directly releated. I looked into addslashes yesterday and
thought that it would be much better to scan the string 2 times. The
first time to find out how much extra bytes one needs, and the second
time to do the actual replacing. So we do not need to allocate and
oversized block
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Andre Cerqueira wrote:
> The 2 first bugs where really bogus, but imho the last one did make sense.
>
> If stripslashes does "Un-quote string quoted with addslashes()", how
> addslashes would come up with:
> > c:\windows\system32
> from:
> > c:windowssystem32
It can't! Ho
Alexander Valyalkin wrote:
What sense of the [allowable_tags] parameter in strip_tags()?
According docs, "You can use the optional second parameter to specify
tags which should not be stripped".
strip_tags alone is indeed not enough to make sure the input is safe to
display inside your web page. B
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Aidan Lister wrote:
> It's entirely likely I've made a mistake somewhere in that list, you're
> welcome to perform your own tests.
They're gone, thanks for providing spam-bait to those address ;-)
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscrib
What sense of the [allowable_tags] parameter in strip_tags()?
According docs, "You can use the optional second parameter to specify
tags which should not be stripped".
Ok. Suppose, I have a PHP-guestbook and use strip_tags() to filter all
tags, excepting ,, in users' messages. Then a "cool-hacker"
Strange, sent it after our conversation on IRC.
I'll post it here.
-
Hi systems,
Here is a bunch of emails I'm sent every time I post to php-install.
The list of addresses to be removed is below.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
I've done some small work to add support for specifying wheter to use snmp
version 1 or 2c in snmp_get and snmp_walk.
It's an optional argument that is defaulted to version 1 ( for not wrecking
any code that is using snmp_get or walk ).
I
The problem is linkage; for some reason, someone (in group@ ?) decided that
they didn't want to link the php core to openssl in the windows builds, and in
php 4.3 you can't use ssl:// or https:// unless it is statically linked.
PHP 5 can handle this dynamically.
Search the bug db; this has been r
I think I just smoked something illegal before posting that question.
The brain damage seems to be gone, sorry for the spam. It just did made
sense at that moment.
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
dharana wrote:
I know I can just cast to int, but is it ok to return an string for
things that can only be
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Alexander Valyalkin wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:56:26 +0400, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >> Ok, my version of stripslashes() is faster, clearer, works correctly
> >> with old
> >> tests and solves mentioned bugs. Are you still doubt? Try to compare
> >>
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:56:26 +0400, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Ok, my version of stripslashes() is faster, clearer, works correctly
with old
tests and solves mentioned bugs. Are you still doubt? Try to compare
the old
(current) code to new one.
Faster is ok, but you'd better read
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:20:01 +0200, Moshe Doron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
in addition, i want to remind that when magic mode is on, this function
been
used by each script to manipulate the $_REQUEST vars so playing with this
peace of code have
1. big codes breaking potential.
2. big security p
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:47:09 -0700 (PDT), Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Uh, what are you guys talking about? That test case is bogus.
$s = 'c:\\windows\\system32';
This means that the base string we are working with is
c:\windows\system32
here before any sort of stripslashes. If
dharana wrote:
I know I can just cast to int, but is it ok to return an string for
things that can only be numbers?
The date() and strftime() functions are expected to always return
strings, no matter what the format string looks like.
The same holds true for sprintf(), you wouldn't expect
sprint
The 2 first bugs where really bogus, but imho the last one did make sense.
If stripslashes does "Un-quote string quoted with addslashes()", how
addslashes would come up with:
> c:\windows\system32
from:
> c:windowssystem32
?
Maybe its to late for a change, now that most people are used to this
b
Hi!
Hope I'm only slightly out of topic with this post...
The PHP problem described here:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=9852
...is a problem with using PHP.EXE as cgi (not isapi) with IIS and html
frames.
I'm experiencing the same problem in a cgi/html-frames/IIS based
application I'm developin
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Lester Caine wrote:
> How long will it be before all of the auto-responders are cleared up on
> php-install, I've just had 15 odd messages triggered my answering post
> there.
>
> Is there someone responsible for managing that list? I'd offer, but
> while I can't get in via eM
Aidan Lister wrote:
Thanks Peter,
I'm not sure what went on then - I got all the bouncer replies from
php-install (sent the list to systems for removal), but the message appeared
on this list, not php-install.
Anyway, apologies for the spam.
Aidan - I have to post this here as any attempt to send y
maybe php.general would be more appropriate
im not a developer, but i think this "feature" doesnt make sense hehe
i think ob display handlers are not supposed to output things directly,
they just return them to the function that will output it
at your first snip, you could/should do:
at the seco
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:50:09 +0300
"Alexander Valyalkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:56:10 +0400, Antony Dovgal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you think it's wrong - prove it.
> > There are quite detailed reasons why those bugs were considered to
> > be bogus.
> >
>
Okin okin wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble with output buffering limitation
and the output_callback function of ob_start.
look at this script :
function ob_perso_handler($buffer)
{
ob_start();
echo 'foo';
$buffer .= ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();
r
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:56:10 +0400, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
If you think it's wrong - prove it.
There are quite detailed reasons why those bugs were considered to
be bogus.
I'm ok if you're going to improve stripslashes() efficiency and/or to
make it just faster, this could be ve
Uh, what are you guys talking about? That test case is bogus.
$s = 'c:\\windows\\system32';
This means that the base string we are working with is c:\windows\system32
here before any sort of stripslashes. If you then call stripslashes() on
that, it will strip these slashes! That's exactly what
Hey,
put this in thedocs somewhere?
regards,
Derick
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Sara Golemon wrote:
> That's true. What I left out of my explanation (in order to keep it simple)
> is that when you "copy" a variable, a new label is created to point to the
> same zval, and the zval's refcount is incrme
35 matches
Mail list logo
