On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:50:09 +0300 "Alexander Valyalkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:56:10 +0400, Antony Dovgal > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you think it's wrong - prove it. > > There are quite detailed reasons why those bugs were considered to > > be bogus. > > > > I'm ok if you're going to improve stripslashes() efficiency and/or > > to make it just faster, this could be very useful addon. But I doubt > > it needs some kind of'fixing', 'cos it works ok ATM, as I know. > Ok, my version of stripslashes() is faster, clearer, works correctly > with old > tests and solves mentioned bugs. Are you still doubt? Try to compare > the old > (current) code to new one. Faster is ok, but you'd better read what Rasmus said. And again, trying to fix BOGUS bugs you're going wrong way. --- WBR, Antony Dovgal aka tony2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
