Ive seen the Control Flow constuct With ...End With used in VB (yup,
VB.. :)) although im not a fan of VB, i liked the feature, is there any
consideration to this kind of construct for php.
here the only example if it i could find online for anyone that hasnt
seen it before.
http://msdn.microsof
Hi folks,
[ http://www.phpconference.com/ ]
time's running fast ahead - we're just announcing the Call for Papers
for 2004's International PHP Conference Spring Edition Amsterdam.
The date for this event for PHP enthusiasts from all over the world will
be May 3rd to May 5th, 2004. The conference
I'm updating swig (www.swig.org) to honour the new php build system, namely
lack of makefile.in etc.
I can't get a config.m4 though that will build a .so, only build a .a or .la
Here is a sample config.m4 swig will generate in the next release:
PHP_ARG_ENABLE(example, [whether to enable example
> > The flip side is that we can provide them with a "localized"
> > (not in the i18n sense!) fix much sooner.
>
> The current snapshot system contains a patched version (after the fix is
> applied) within 2 hours at most for source distributions and 4 hours for
> win32 distributions.
By localized
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> > For this to work pear install needs to work first.
> > Try "pear install tidy" -> doesn't work, while "pear download tidy"
> > works fine. And as the pear installer has as much docs as the Zend
> > engine... I've no time/clue on where to start look
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 21:12:44 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:57:52 -
> > "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > if we get a new maintainer, i'd like him to be able to roll
> > > > ind
On December 9, 2003 03:24 pm, Wez Furlong wrote:
> The flip side is that we can provide them with a "localized"
> (not in the i18n sense!) fix much sooner.
The current snapshot system contains a patched version (after the fix is
applied) within 2 hours at most for source distributions and 4 hours
> >This isn't really a problem as you tend to mark all bug
> >reports as bogus anyway, and no one else provides support.
>
> Sorry, I forgot, of course the relevant bug categories will
> also be moved to http://pecl.php.net/bugs/.
>
> FYI: I don't mark all bug reports as bogus. Only
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Wez Furlong wrote:
>> And you're moving us into the support nightmare..
>> Instead of asking what php version they use, we need
>> to start asking which possible versions of different
>> extensions they happen to use, how they compiled them,
>> etc. etc. etc
> And you're moving us into the support nightmare..
> Instead of asking what php version they use, we need
> to start asking which possible versions of different
> extensions they happen to use, how they compiled them,
> etc. etc. etc.
The flip side is that we can provide them
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Wez Furlong wrote:
>> it was actually my idea to for the oci8 stuff - and have some new
>> maintainer maintain it in pecl.
>
>Yep, I remember.
>
>> i see no valid reason against it. he can start hacking on it (in pecl)
>> starting today - once he is comfortable with it we'll
Wez Furlong wrote:
> What would be better is a little bit of info on how to fix broken
> cscript installations ;-)
Yep :)
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Das Buch zu PHP 5: http://professionelle-softwareentwicklung-mit-php5.de/
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 21:12:44 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:57:52 -
> > "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > if we get a new maintainer, i'd like him to be able to roll
> > > > ind
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:57:52 -
> "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > if we get a new maintainer, i'd like him to be able to roll
> > > independent from the main-tree. (also - don't forget - not too many
> > > ppls use oracle, and those
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:57:52 -
"Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > if we get a new maintainer, i'd like him to be able to roll
> > independent from the main-tree. (also - don't forget - not too many
> > ppls use oracle, and those who do would be more than happy to get
> > new features/
> it was actually my idea to for the oci8 stuff - and have some new
> maintainer maintain it in pecl.
Yep, I remember.
> i see no valid reason against it. he can start hacking on it (in pecl)
> starting today - once he is comfortable with it we'll nuke the ext/oci
> and use(link, package) the
Hey Sebastian,
I don't really want to to commit this patch because it makes
things more ugly in appearance. What would be better is
a little bit of info on how to fix broken cscript installations ;-)
--Wez.
- Original Message -
From: "Sebastian Bergmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
The attached patch adds support for broken cscript installations (like
mine) where JScript is not registered with cscript.exe.
It works for me and should do so, too, for sane installations as well.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
D
it was actually my idea to for the oci8 stuff - and have some new
maintainer maintain it in pecl.
i see no valid reason against it. he can start hacking on it (in pecl)
starting today - once he is comfortable with it we'll nuke the ext/oci
and use(link, package) the stuff from pecl.
loosing al
Hi King Wez ;)
Amen.
pierre
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
It seems that most people still don't really get the idea behind
PECL, and how moving extensions there is a good idea.
Let me spell it out for you:
- PECL provides a way to keep your extensions self contained and
allows you to keep your own release cycle.
- In addition, the packaging systems al
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 17:33:11 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>
> > > Synchronizing is going to be hellish... and I don't see the point here
> > > unless you're doing a rewrite. Let's go back to just working on the
> > > extension in
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> > Synchronizing is going to be hellish... and I don't see the point here
> > unless you're doing a rewrite. Let's go back to just working on the
> > extension in php-src for now, we can always move it to PECL later. Now
> > we have TWO versions, one being
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 17:20:54 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:55:13 +0100
> > "Edin Kadribasic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Wtf? OCI8 *needs* to be in the main distro. When was this move discussed?
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:55:13 +0100
> "Edin Kadribasic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Wtf? OCI8 *needs* to be in the main distro. When was this move discussed? We
> > just got a new module maintainer.
>
> Thies suggested and Jani agreed just to copy it t
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:15:26 +0200 (EET)
Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:55:13 +0100
> >"Edin Kadribasic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Wtf? OCI8 *needs* to be in the main distro. When was this move discussed? We
> > Wtf? OCI8 *needs* to be in the main distro. When was this move
discussed? We
> > just got a new module maintainer.
>
> Thies suggested and Jani agreed just to copy it to PECL.
I feel like I've been tricked here; you imported the stuff straight
into the repository without permission, and so the
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:55:13 +0100
>"Edin Kadribasic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Wtf? OCI8 *needs* to be in the main distro. When was this move discussed? We
>> just got a new module maintainer.
>
>Thies suggested and Jani agreed just to copy it to PEC
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:55:13 +0100
"Edin Kadribasic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wtf? OCI8 *needs* to be in the main distro. When was this move discussed? We
> just got a new module maintainer.
Thies suggested and Jani agreed just to copy it to PECL.
It's much more convenient to have oci8 there
Wtf? OCI8 *needs* to be in the main distro. When was this move discussed? We
just got a new module maintainer.
Edin
- Original Message -
From: "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 4:20 PM
Subject: [PHP-CVS] cvs: CVSROOT / avail
> wez
I think that as long as you follow the naming standards for constants which
are EXTNAME_CONSTANT it should be OK to just define them as regular global
constants during MINIT.
Andi
At 01:45 PM 12/8/2003 -0500, Justin Hannus wrote:
sent to php.pecl.dev and php.internals
--
It simply ocurred to me that the "magic numbers" being used for the 2nd param
to error_log() could just as easily be constants.
Just one possible way:
http://joeysmith.com/~joey/constants.diff
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsu
32 matches
Mail list logo
