Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/16] kselftests: Exercise hw-independent mock tests for i915.ko

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 08:50:17AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/07/2016 07:09 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:58:19PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> Although being a GPU driver most functionality of i915.ko depends upon > >> real hardware, many of its internal interfaces

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Respect ring_mask and num_pipes when install IRQ

2016-12-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:46:49PM +0800, Wang Elaine wrote: > From: Elaine Wang > > Some platforms only have VCS ring in VDBox. To avoid accessing the > non-existent rings or display registers, check the ring_mask > and num_pipes in gen8 IRQ install and reset functions. > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't clflush before release phys object

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Wilson
When we teardown the backing storage for the phys object, we copy from the coherent contiguous block back to the shmemfs object, clflushing as we go. Trying to clflush the invalid sg beforehand just oops and would be redundant (due to it already being coherent, and clflushed afterwards). Reported-

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Use pipe_src_w in overlay code

2016-12-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 08:35:48AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 07:28:07PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Replace the use of crtc->mode.h/vdisplay with the more appropriate > > config->pipe_src_w/h. > > I'll ask the dumb questi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/8] GEN-9 Arbitrated Bandwidth WM WA's & IPC

2016-12-08 Thread Zanoni, Paulo R
Em Qui, 2016-12-08 às 17:00 +0100, Daniel Vetter escreveu: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 05:35:09PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > > Em Qui, 2016-12-01 às 21:19 +0530, Mahesh Kumar escreveu: > > > > > > This series implements following set of functionality > > > Implement IPC WA's for Broxton/KBL

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Reorganize overlay filter coeffs into a nicer form

2016-12-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 08:45:31AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 07:28:10PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Use two-dimensional arrays and named initializers to make the > > overlay filter coefficient tables easier to parse for hu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/8] GEN-9 Arbitrated Bandwidth WM WA's & IPC

2016-12-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:12:37PM +, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote: > Em Qui, 2016-12-08 às 17:00 +0100, Daniel Vetter escreveu: > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 05:35:09PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > > > > Em Qui, 2016-12-01 às 21:19 +0530, Mahesh Kumar escreveu: > > > > > > > > This series impleme

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Reorder phys backing storage release (rev3)

2016-12-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Reorder phys backing storage release (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16468/ State : success == Summary == Series 16468v3 drm/i915: Reorder phys backing storage release https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16468/revisions/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Reorganize overlay filter coeffs into a nicer form

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:17:28PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 08:45:31AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 07:28:10PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com > > wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > Use two-dimensional arrays and named initial

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: split off Pineview desktop and mobile device info

2016-12-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:58:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:11:50AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > > >> This lets us use IS_MOBILE() for distinguishing the desktop and mobile > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Test all fw tables during mock selftests

2016-12-08 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 07/12/2016 18:52, Chris Wilson wrote: In addition to just testing the fw table we load, during the initial mock testing we can test that all tables are valid (so the testing is not limited to just the platforms that load that particular table). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Don't clflush before release phys object

2016-12-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Don't clflush before release phys object URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16569/ State : warning == Summary == Series 16569v1 drm/i915: Don't clflush before release phys object https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16569/revisions

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Don't clflush before release phys object

2016-12-08 Thread Saarinen, Jani
> == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Don't clflush before release phys object > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16569/ > State : warning > > == Summary == > > Series 16569v1 drm/i915: Don't clflush before release phys object > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/se

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915: Add unit tests for the breadcrumb rbtree, wakeups

2016-12-08 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 07/12/2016 13:58, Chris Wilson wrote: Third retroactive test, make sure that the seqno waiters are woken. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 171 +++ 1 file changed, 171 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/int

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Don't clflush before release phys object

2016-12-08 Thread Imre Deak
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 19:22 +0200, Saarinen, Jani wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915: Don't clflush before release phys object > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16569/ > > State : warning > > > > == Summary == > > > > Series 16569v1 drm/i915: Don't clflus

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915: Add a reminder that i915_vma_move_to_active() requires struct_mutex

2016-12-08 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 07/12/2016 13:58, Chris Wilson wrote: i915_vma_move_to_active() requires the struct_mutex for serialisation with retirement, so mark it up with lockdep_assert_held(). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --gi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915: Move intel_lrc_context_pin() to avoid the forward declaration

2016-12-08 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 07/12/2016 13:58, Chris Wilson wrote: Just a simple move to avoid a forward declaration. Patch subject is wrong - you are moving intel_logical_ring_alloc_request_extras. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 132 +++ 1 f

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not reset detect_done flag in intel_dp_detect

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:58:44PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 07:51:21PM -0800, Manasi Navare wrote: > > Ville, > > You mentioned that this detect_done should be set to false also > > in the resume case so in i915_display_resume where it calls > > intel_hpd_init that even

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dim: Update docs for update-branches

2016-12-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
It's been years since drm-intel had only one maintainer, and the primary use-case for dim ub was only to sync between machines. Update the docs to reflect this, to avoid misleading committers. Also update the maintainer-tools branch, which is something Paulo's script also does. Motivated because P

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Compute sink's max lane count/link BW at Hotplug

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
Jani, Could you please review this patch? This is the patch that calculates the max sink link rate and max sink lane count only once at hotplug and then anytime the max lane count and common rates are requested, the helper functions use these values. This simplifies the fallback logic since we ca

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Find fallback link rate/lane count

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
Hi Jani, This patch uses the simplified fallback logic where if link train fails, we first lower the max sink link rate to a lower value until it reaches RBR keeping the max lane count unchanged and then lower the lane count and set max lane count to this lowered lane count and resetting the link

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Implement Link Rate fallback on Link training failure

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
Hi Jani, Could you please review this patch? This patch was changed a bit from the last time you reviewed it based on feedback from Sean Paul that the driver need not validate the modes and prune the mode on link training failure. Instead it should just send the hotplug uevent after setting link s

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: report psr2 status from psr2_ctl

2016-12-08 Thread vathsala nagaraju
Reads psr2 enable status from EDP_PSR2_CTL Cc: Rodrigo Vivi Signed-off-by: vathsala nagaraju --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index a74

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/4] drm: Add a new connector atomic property for link status

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
At the time userspace does setcrtc, we've already promised the mode would work. The promise is based on the theoretical capabilities of the link, but it's possible we can't reach this in practice. The DP spec describes how the link should be reduced, but we can't reduce the link below the requireme

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/psr: report psr2 status from psr2_ctl

2016-12-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/psr: report psr2 status from psr2_ctl URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16577/ State : success == Summary == Series 16577v1 drm/i915/psr: report psr2 status from psr2_ctl https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16577/revisions/1/mbox/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/4] drm: Add a new connector atomic property for link status

2016-12-08 Thread Sean Paul
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c > index 72fa5b2..34eddb9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c > @@ -1087,6 +1087,22 @@ int drm_atomic_connector_set_property(struct > drm_connector *connector, >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/4] drm: Add a new connector atomic property for link status

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
At the time userspace does setcrtc, we've already promised the mode would work. The promise is based on the theoretical capabilities of the link, but it's possible we can't reach this in practice. The DP spec describes how the link should be reduced, but we can't reduce the link below the requireme

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/4] drm: Add a new connector atomic property for link status

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
Thanks Sean. Done, fixed the typo and submitted the patch. Regards Manasi On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:36:25PM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c > > index 72fa5b2..34eddb9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c > > +++

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Link Training failure handling by sending Hotplug Uevent (rev3)

2016-12-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: Link Training failure handling by sending Hotplug Uevent (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16399/ State : failure == Summary == Series 16399v3 Link Training failure handling by sending Hotplug Uevent https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/ser

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Link Training failure handling by sending Hotplug Uevent (rev4)

2016-12-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: Link Training failure handling by sending Hotplug Uevent (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16399/ State : failure == Summary == Series 16399v4 Link Training failure handling by sending Hotplug Uevent https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/ser

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915: Move intel_lrc_context_pin() to avoid the forward declaration

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:45:23PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 07/12/2016 13:58, Chris Wilson wrote: > >Just a simple move to avoid a forward declaration. > > Patch subject is wrong - you are moving > intel_logical_ring_alloc_request_extras. I moved what I said, what diff shows is the op

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v6,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during CDCLK change notification

2016-12-08 Thread Imre Deak
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 18:59 +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: series starting with [v6,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during > CDCLK change notification > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16375/ > State : success > > == Summary == > > Series 16375

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: split off Pineview desktop and mobile device info

2016-12-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:58:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:11:50AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> > On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: >> > > On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: >> > >> This lets us use IS_MOBIL

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915: Add unit tests for the breadcrumb rbtree, wakeups

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:38:34PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 07/12/2016 13:58, Chris Wilson wrote: > >Third retroactive test, make sure that the seqno waiters are woken. > > > >Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > >--- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 171 > > +++

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Compute sink's max lane count/link BW at Hotplug

2016-12-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Manasi Navare wrote: > Sink's capabilities are advertised through DPCD registers and get > updated only on hotplug. So they should be computed only once in the > long pulse handler and saved off in intel_dp structure for the use > later. For this reason two new fields max_sink

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Compute sink's max lane count/link BW at Hotplug

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:23:39PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Manasi Navare wrote: > > Sink's capabilities are advertised through DPCD registers and get > > updated only on hotplug. So they should be computed only once in the > > long pulse handler and saved off in intel_dp s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Compute sink's max lane count/link BW at Hotplug

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
Daniel, can we merge this patch? It has no dependency on other link train patches, it is just a clean up for the existing driver code that uses max link rate and lane count values. Other link train patches have dependency on this thats why it was part of the series. But it would be great if this ge

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Find fallback link rate/lane count

2016-12-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Manasi Navare wrote: > If link training fails, then we need to fallback to lower > link rate first and if link training fails at RBR, then > fallback to lower lane count. > This function finds the next lower link rate/lane count > value after link training failure and limits t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Implement Link Rate fallback on Link training failure

2016-12-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Manasi Navare wrote: > If link training at a link rate optimal for a particular > mode fails during modeset's atomic commit phase, then we > let the modeset complete and then retry. We save the link rate > value at which link training failed, update the link status property >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dim: Update docs for update-branches

2016-12-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's been years since drm-intel had only one maintainer, and the > primary use-case for dim ub was only to sync between machines. Update > the docs to reflect this, to avoid misleading committers. Also update > the maintainer-tools branch, which is somet

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Find fallback link rate/lane count

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:46:02PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Manasi Navare wrote: > > If link training fails, then we need to fallback to lower > > link rate first and if link training fails at RBR, then > > fallback to lower lane count. > > This function finds the next lowe

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Implement Link Rate fallback on Link training failure

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:51:30PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Manasi Navare wrote: > > If link training at a link rate optimal for a particular > > mode fails during modeset's atomic commit phase, then we > > let the modeset complete and then retry. We save the link rate > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Test all fw tables during mock selftests

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:52:24PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > Idea for another late test: > > for (offset = 0; offset < 0x4; offset++) { > fw_domain = intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(dev_priv, { .reg = > offset }, FW_REG_READ | FW_REG_WRITE); > if (WARN_ON(fw_domain & ~dev_priv-

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/atomic: Unconditionally call prepare_fb.

2016-12-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Thursday 08 Dec 2016 16:41:04 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:45:25PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > Atomic drivers may set properties like rotation on the same fb, which > > may require a call to prepare_fb even when framebuffer stays identical. > > > > Inste

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8]HuC Loading Patches

2016-12-08 Thread anushasr
These patches add HuC loading support. The GuC is required to authenticate the HuC. The userspace patches that check for a fully loaded HuC firmware and use it can be found at: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libva/2016-September/004554.html https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libva/201

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/HuC: Add KBL huC loading Support

2016-12-08 Thread anushasr
From: Anusha Srivatsa This patch adds the support to load HuC on KBL Version 2.0 v2: rebased. v3: rebased on top of drm-tip v4: rebased. Cc: Jeff Mcgee Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa Reviewed-by: Jeff McGee --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc_loader.c | 16 1 file changed, 1

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/huc: Unified css_header struct for GuC and HuC

2016-12-08 Thread anushasr
From: Peter Antoine HuC firmware css header has almost exactly same definition as GuC firmware except for the sw_version. Also, add a new member fw_type into intel_uc_fw to indicate what kind of fw it is. So, the loader will pull right sw_version from header. v2: rebased on-top of drm-intel-nigh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/huc: Add BXT HuC Loading Support

2016-12-08 Thread anushasr
From: Anusha Srivatsa This patch adds the HuC Loading for the BXT by using the updated file construction. Version 1.7 of the HuC firmware. v2: rebased. v3: rebased on top of drm-tip v4: rebased. Cc: Jeff Mcgee Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa Reviewed-by: Jeff McGee --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-08 Thread anushasr
From: Peter Antoine This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated status to show when the HuC is loaded and ready for use. You cannot use the loaded status as with the GuC as the HuC is verified after i

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/guc: Make the GuC fw loading helper functions general

2016-12-08 Thread anushasr
From: Peter Antoine Rename some of the GuC fw loading code to make them more general. We will utilise them for HuC loading as well. s/intel_guc_fw/intel_uc_fw/g s/GUC_FIRMWARE/UC_FIRMWARE/g Struct intel_guc_fw is renamed to intel_uc_fw. Prefix of tts members, such as 'guc' or 'guc_fw'

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/huc: Support HuC authentication

2016-12-08 Thread anushasr
From: Peter Antoine The HuC authentication is done by host2guc call. The HuC RSA keys are sent to GuC for authentication. v2: rebased on top of drm-intel-nightly. changed name format and upped version 1.7. v3: rebased on top of drm-intel-nightly. v4: changed wait_for_automic to wait_for v5:

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/huc: Add debugfs for HuC loading status check

2016-12-08 Thread anushasr
From: Peter Antoine Add debugfs entry for HuC loading status check. v2: rebase on-top of drm-intel-nightly. v3: rebased again. v7: rebased. v8: rebased. v9: rebased. v10: rebased. v11: rebased on top of drm-tip v12: rebased. Tested-by: Xiang Haihao Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa Signed-off-by

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/huc: Add HuC fw loading support

2016-12-08 Thread anushasr
From: Anusha Srivatsa The HuC loading process is similar to GuC. The intel_uc_fw_fetch() is used for both cases. HuC loading needs to be before GuC loading. The WOPCM setting must be done early before loading any of them. v2: rebased on-top of drm-intel-nightly. removed if(HAS_GUC()) before

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for HuC Loading Patches

2016-12-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: HuC Loading Patches URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16584/ State : success == Summary == Series 16584v1 HuC Loading Patches https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16584/revisions/1/mbox/ fi-bdw-5557u total:247 pass:233 dwarn:0 dfa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 03:02:19PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > From: Peter Antoine > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated > status to show when the HuC is loaded and ready for use. You cannot

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 7/8] drm/i915: Decode system memory bandwidth

2016-12-08 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qui, 2016-12-01 às 21:19 +0530, Mahesh Kumar escreveu: > This patch adds support to decode system memory bandwidth > which will be used for arbitrated display memory percentage > calculation in GEN9 based system. > > Changes from v1: >  - Address comments from Paulo >  - implement decode functi

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Add support for DP link training compliance

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
This patch adds support to handle automated DP compliance link training test requests. This patch has been tested with Unigraf DPR-120 DP Compliance device for testing Link Training Compliance. After we get a short pulse Compliance test request, test request values are read and hotplug uevent is se

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Fixes to support DP Compliance EDID tests

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
This patch addresses a few issues from the original patch for DP Compliance EDID test support submitted by Todd Previte Video Mode requested in the EDID test handler for the EDID Read test (CTS 4.2.2.3) should be set to PREFERRED as per the CTS spec. Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare Cc: Jani Nikula

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Move all the DP compliance data to a separate struct

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
This patch does not change anything functionally, just cleans up the DP compliance related variables and stores them all together in a separate struct intel_dp_compliance. There is another struct intel_dp_compliance_data to store all the test data. This makes it easy to reset the compliance variabl

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] Add Automation Support for DP Compliance Testing (Rev 2)

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
This addresses all the review comments from the earlier patch series: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/15771/ DP 1.2 compliance testing can be acheived using DPR-120's CTS suite. This compliance unit sends a short pulse to initiate link training and video pattern generation compliance test

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm: Add definitions for DP compliance Video pattern tests

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
v2: * Add all the other DP Complianec TEST register defs (Jani Nikula) Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Ville Syrjala Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare --- include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 58 + 1 file changed, 58 ins

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Add support for DP Video pattern compliance tests

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
The intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern() function gets invoked through the compliance test handler on a HPD short pulse if the test type is set to DP_TEST_VIDEO_PATTERN. This performs the DPCD registers reads to read the requested test pattern, video pattern resolution, frame rate and bits per color v

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Add Automation Support for DP Compliance Testing (Rev 2)

2016-12-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: Add Automation Support for DP Compliance Testing (Rev 2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16591/ State : failure == Summary == Series 16591v1 Add Automation Support for DP Compliance Testing (Rev 2) https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/165

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 3/4] drm/i915: Find fallback link rate/lane count

2016-12-08 Thread Manasi Navare
If link training fails, then we need to fallback to lower link rate first and if link training fails at RBR, then fallback to lower lane count. This function finds the next lower link rate/lane count value after link training failure and limits the max link_rate and lane_count values to these fallb

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Link Training failure handling by sending Hotplug Uevent (rev5)

2016-12-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: Link Training failure handling by sending Hotplug Uevent (rev5) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16399/ State : failure == Summary == Series 16399v5 Link Training failure handling by sending Hotplug Uevent https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/ser

<    1   2