Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 12:13 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:29:09 -0500, Jon Masters > wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:22 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > > As I mentioned on IRC, I'm familiar with how I2C works electrically, and > > > therefore EDID implementation as a conce

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 12:13 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:29:09 -0500, Jon Masters > wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:22 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > > As I mentioned on IRC, I'm familiar with how I2C works electrically, and > > > therefore EDID implementation as a conce

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:29:09 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:22 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > As I mentioned on IRC, I'm familiar with how I2C works electrically, and > > therefore EDID implementation as a concept, but I am not really a > > graphics hacker so I wasn't aware th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 11:33 +, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > On 8 November 2010 10:54, Jon Masters wrote: > > > > Here is the EDID output after booting: > > > > [...@monticello ~]$ hexdump /sys/class/drm/card0-LVDS-1/edid > > 000 ff00 00ff 6422 03e9 8544 0001 > > 010 141c 03

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:29 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:22 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 05:54 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > > > > Here is the EDID output after booting: > > > > > > [...@monticello ~]$ hexdump /sys/class/drm/card0-LVDS-1/edid > > > 0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 11:26 +, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > On 8 November 2010 10:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:18:32 -0500, Jon Masters > > wrote: > >> Hi Chris, > >> > >> The following patch that you recently committed breaks my ASUS Eee PC > >> 1015PEM by causing th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:22 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 05:54 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > > Here is the EDID output after booting: > > > > [...@monticello ~]$ hexdump /sys/class/drm/card0-LVDS-1/edid > > 000 ff00 00ff 6422 03e9 8544 0001 > > 010 141c 0301

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 05:54 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > Here is the EDID output after booting: > > [...@monticello ~]$ hexdump /sys/class/drm/card0-LVDS-1/edid > 000 ff00 00ff 6422 03e9 8544 0001 > 010 141c 0301 1680 780d 860a 9426 5157 2790 > 020 4f21 0054 0101 0101 01

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 10:27 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:18:32 -0500, Jon Masters > wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > The following patch that you recently committed breaks my ASUS Eee PC > > 1015PEM by causing the display to be offset by about 1 inch (a few > > centimeters) wh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:18:32 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Chris, > > The following patch that you recently committed breaks my ASUS Eee PC > 1015PEM by causing the display to be offset by about 1 inch (a few > centimeters) when the mode is (re)set during boot. I previously posted > both photogr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 05:18 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > The following patch that you recently committed breaks my ASUS Eee PC > 1015PEM by causing the display to be offset by about 1 inch (a few > centimeters) when the mode is (re)set during boot. I previously posted > both photographs and video o