On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:29 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:22 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 05:54 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > > > > Here is the EDID output after booting: > > > > > > [...@monticello ~]$ hexdump /sys/class/drm/card0-LVDS-1/edid > > > 0000000 ff00 ffff ffff 00ff 6422 03e9 8544 0001 > > > 0000010 141c 0301 1680 780d 860a 9426 5157 2790 > > > 0000020 4f21 0054 0000 0101 0101 0101 0101 0101 > > > 0000030 0101 0101 0101 1194 b000 5840 2019 2335 > > > 0000040 0045 81dc 0000 1900 1416 d800 5840 2026 > > > 0000050 235d 0415 81dc 0000 0000 0000 fe00 0000 > > > 0000060 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fe00 > > > 0000070 0000 0000 0000 0000 0100 0000 0000 f200 > > > 0000080 > > > > As I mentioned on IRC, I'm familiar with how I2C works electrically, and > > therefore EDID implementation as a concept, but I am not really a > > graphics hacker so I wasn't aware that you prefer edid-decode :) > > > > Here is a decoded version of the output: > > And here is an old file I had with the output when running a broken > kernel with the cacheing enabled: > > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 600, maximum 4096 x 4096 > LVDS1 connected 1024x600+0+0 (0x43) normal (normal left inverted right x > axis y axis) 220mm x 129mm > Identifier: 0x41 > Timestamp: 1402374 > Subpixel: horizontal rgb > Gamma: 1.0:1.0:1.0 > Brightness: 1.0 > Clones: > CRTC: 1 > CRTCs: 1 > Transform: 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 > 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 > 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 > filter: > EDID: > 00ffffffffffff002264e90344850100 > 1c14010380160d780a86269457519027 > 214f5400000001010101010101010101 > 010101010101941100b0405819203523 > 4500dc8100000019161400d840582620 > 5d231504dc8100000000000000fe0000 > 000000000000000000000000000000fe > 000000000000000000010000000000f2 > BACKLIGHT: 10 (0x0000000a) range: (0,10) > Backlight: 10 (0x0000000a) range: (0,10) > scaling mode: Full aspect > supported: None Full Center Full aspect > 1024x600 (0x43) 45.0MHz -HSync -VSync *current +preferred > h: width 1024 start 1077 end 1112 total 1200 skew 0 clock > 37.5KHz > v: height 600 start 604 end 609 total 625 clock > 60.0Hz > 1024x600 (0x44) 51.4MHz -HSync -VSync > h: width 1024 start 1117 end 1152 total 1240 skew 0 clock > 41.5KHz > v: height 600 start 601 end 606 total 638 clock > 65.0Hz > 800x600 (0x45) 40.0MHz +HSync +VSync > h: width 800 start 840 end 968 total 1056 skew 0 clock > 37.9KHz > v: height 600 start 601 end 605 total 628 clock > 60.3Hz > 800x600 (0x46) 36.0MHz +HSync +VSync > h: width 800 start 824 end 896 total 1024 skew 0 clock > 35.2KHz > v: height 600 start 601 end 603 total 625 clock > 56.2Hz > 640x480 (0x47) 25.2MHz -HSync -VSync > h: width 640 start 656 end 752 total 800 skew 0 clock > 31.5KHz > v: height 480 start 490 end 492 total 525 clock > 59.9Hz > VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > Identifier: 0x42 > Timestamp: 1402374 > Subpixel: unknown > Clones: > CRTCs: 0 1 > Transform: 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 > 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 > 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 > filter:
FWIW I don't recall seeing any reported difference in xrandr. I think what I need is a hacked up debug patch if you can spin me one. Night! Jon. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
