Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 15:07 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> On 10/31/2010 9:44 AM, Alexey Fisher wrote:
> > Hallo all,
> >
> > after testing latest intel_drm_next v2.6.36-07547-g100519e on my netbook
> > i have seen interesting issue. Standardly started glxgears performs not
> > so well, it
Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 20:18 +0100 schrieb Andreas Mohr:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 06:40:26PM +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 17:01 + schrieb Peter Clifton:
> > > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:44 +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote:
> > > > Hallo all,
> > > >
> > > > As i ca
Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 17:01 + schrieb Peter Clifton:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:44 +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote:
> > Hallo all,
> >
> > As i can understand if cpu do not get enough load it will work mostly in
> > C4 mode and graphic perfome slow too. I think there is some thing wrong
> > i
On Sunday 31 October 2010 18:44:47 Alexey Fisher wrote:
> Hallo all,
>
> after testing latest intel_drm_next v2.6.36-07547-g100519e on my netbook
> i have seen interesting issue. Standardly started glxgears performs not
> so well, it drops some times to 25fps.
> if start glxgears in fullscrean mod
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:44 +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote:
> Hallo all,
>
> As i can understand if cpu do not get enough load it will work mostly in
> C4 mode and graphic perfome slow too. I think there is some thing wrong
> in this logic :)
Yes, a little messed up.. try running your test at low scr
Hallo all,
after testing latest intel_drm_next v2.6.36-07547-g100519e on my netbook
i have seen interesting issue. Standardly started glxgears performs not
so well, it drops some times to 25fps.
if start glxgears in fullscrean mode it performs well - about 60fps.
here is powertop --dump, glxgears
