Re: [Intel-gfx] Increased latency from removal of GEM_THROTTLE in 2D driver

On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 01:44:59 +, Peter Clifton wrote: > I've been playing with my app again, and whilst it seems a tiny bit > faster in benchmarks, since the 2D driver change: > > commit 8ff37667bf864b771d16a58fc5041cb48408b6a8 > Author: Eric Anholt > Date: Tue Nov 2 10:36:03 2010 -0700 >

Re: [Intel-gfx] Increased latency from removal of GEM_THROTTLE in 2D driver

On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 01:44:59 +, Peter Clifton wrote: > Presumably this says something bad about my app, or its benchmarking > code. Any clues as to what that is? > > Without the commit, I can use other X11 apps whilst my PCB program is > benchmarking. With it, the X11 server graphics almost c

[Intel-gfx] Increased latency from removal of GEM_THROTTLE in 2D driver

I've been playing with my app again, and whilst it seems a tiny bit faster in benchmarks, since the 2D driver change: commit 8ff37667bf864b771d16a58fc5041cb48408b6a8 Author: Eric Anholt Date: Tue Nov 2 10:36:03 2010 -0700 Remove the intermittent GEM_THROTTLE call. I've noticed the latenc