On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 20:22 -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > Current consensus that it is redundant as
> > we already have skl_ddb_values struct out there,
> > also this struct contains only single member
> > which makes it unnecess
On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
>> struct skl_wm_level {
>> @@ -1215,6 +1210,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>> bool distrust_bios_wm;
>> } wm;
>>
>> +u8 enabled_slices; /* GEN11 has configurable
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Current consensus that it is redundant as
> we already have skl_ddb_values struct out there,
> also this struct contains only single member
> which makes it unnecessary.
>
> v2: As dirty_pipes soon going to be nuked away
>
Current consensus that it is redundant as
we already have skl_ddb_values struct out there,
also this struct contains only single member
which makes it unnecessary.
v2: As dirty_pipes soon going to be nuked away
from skl_ddb_values, evacuating enabled_slices
to safer in dev_priv.
Signed-of
