On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 10:19 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 12:12:50PM +0530, Akash Goel wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 13:03 +0530, Akash Goel wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:27:00AM +0530, Akash Goel w
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 12:12:50PM +0530, Akash Goel wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 13:03 +0530, Akash Goel wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:27:00AM +0530, Akash Goel wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 10:14 +0200, Daniel Vetter w
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 13:03 +0530, Akash Goel wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:27:00AM +0530, Akash Goel wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 10:14 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:43:12PM -0700, Jesse Barnes
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:27:00AM +0530, Akash Goel wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 10:14 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:43:12PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 14 May 2014 00:30:34 +0200
> > > > Da
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:27:00AM +0530, Akash Goel wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 10:14 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:43:12PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 May 2014 00:30:34 +0200
> > > Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:05:2
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 10:14 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:43:12PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 May 2014 00:30:34 +0200
> > Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:05:24PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:19:03 +053
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:43:12PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 00:30:34 +0200
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:05:24PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:19:03 +0530
> > > akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > @@ -810,6 +815,7
On Wed, 14 May 2014 00:30:34 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:05:24PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:19:03 +0530
> > akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -810,6 +815,7 @@ static void gen6_ppgtt_insert_entries(struct
> > > i915_address_space *vm,
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:05:24PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:19:03 +0530
> akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
>
> > @@ -810,6 +815,7 @@ static void gen6_ppgtt_insert_entries(struct
> > i915_address_space *vm,
> > pt_vaddr[act_pte] =
> > vm->pte_e
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:19:03 +0530
akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
> @@ -810,6 +815,7 @@ static void gen6_ppgtt_insert_entries(struct
> i915_address_space *vm,
> pt_vaddr[act_pte] =
> vm->pte_encode(sg_page_iter_dma_address(&sg_iter),
>
Hi Chris,
Gentle reminder, Please can you review this patch, have address the review
comments.
Best Regards
Akash
-Original Message-
From: Goel, Akash
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:19 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Goel, Akash
Subject: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Added write-
From: Akash Goel
This adds support for a write-enable bit in the entry of GTT.
This is handled via a read-only flag in the GEM buffer object which
is then used to see how to set the bit when writing the GTT entries.
Currently by default the Batch buffer & Ring buffers are marked as read only.
v2
12 matches
Mail list logo