On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:59:16AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:22:56AM +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 09:12:06PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > Make the dbuf bandwidth min cdclk calculations match the
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:22:56AM +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 09:12:06PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Make the dbuf bandwidth min cdclk calculations match the spec
> > more closely. Supposedly the arbiter can only guarantee an equal
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 09:12:06PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Make the dbuf bandwidth min cdclk calculations match the spec
> more closely. Supposedly the arbiter can only guarantee an equal
> share of the total bandwidth of the slice to each active plane
> on that slic
From: Ville Syrjälä
Make the dbuf bandwidth min cdclk calculations match the spec
more closely. Supposedly the arbiter can only guarantee an equal
share of the total bandwidth of the slice to each active plane
on that slice. So we take the max bandwidth of any of the planes
on each slice and mult
