On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:41:00PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:36:10PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > We don't do CPU access to GPU contexts so making the GPU access snoop
> > the CPU caches seems silly, and potentially expe
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:36:10PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> We don't do CPU access to GPU contexts so making the GPU access snoop
> the CPU caches seems silly, and potentially expensive.
>
> v2: Use !IS_VALLEYVIEW instead of HAS_LLC as this is really
From: Ville Syrjälä
We don't do CPU access to GPU contexts so making the GPU access snoop
the CPU caches seems silly, and potentially expensive.
v2: Use !IS_VALLEYVIEW instead of HAS_LLC as this is really
about what the PTEs can represent.
Add a comment clarifying the situation.
Signed-
