From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
We don't do CPU access to GPU contexts so making the GPU access snoop
the CPU caches seems silly, and potentially expensive.
v2: Use !IS_VALLEYVIEW instead of HAS_LLC as this is really
about what the PTEs can represent.
Add a comment clarifying the situation.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
index 8827892..30b355a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -240,7 +240,15 @@ __create_hw_context(struct drm_device *dev,
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
- if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 7) {
+ /*
+ * Try to make the context utilize L3 as well as LLC.
+ *
+ * On VLV we don't have L3 controls in the PTEs so we
+ * shouldn't touch the cache level, especially as that
+ * would make the object snooped which might have a
+ * negative performance impact.
+ */
+ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 7 && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
ret = i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(ctx->obj,
I915_CACHE_L3_LLC);
/* Failure shouldn't ever happen this early */
--
1.8.3.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
