Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] uxa/glamor: Create glamor pixmap by default.

2011-12-29 Thread Zhigang Gong
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:27 PM > To: zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; zhigang.g...@gmail.com; > zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] uxa/glamor: C

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] uxa/glamor: Create glamor pixmap by default.

2011-12-28 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:09:18 +0800, zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Zhigang Gong > > As a pure glamor pixmap has a local texture rather than > bind a pixmap to a external BO. This can avoid some > unecessary flush, and can achieve better performance. > The testing on my machine shows

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] uxa/glamor: Create glamor pixmap by default.

2011-12-27 Thread zhigang . gong
From: Zhigang Gong As a pure glamor pixmap has a local texture rather than bind a pixmap to a external BO. This can avoid some unecessary flush, and can achieve better performance. The testing on my machine shows that aa10text/rgb10text get about 20-30% performance improvement. Signed-off-by: Zh