On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:18:58PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:27:54PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:44:09PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 03:29:54PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> > > wrote:
> > > > From
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:27:54PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:44:09PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 03:29:54PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> > wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Admi
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:44:09PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 03:29:54PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Admittedly I haven't checked them closely, but with my proposed patch in
> he modeset_
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 03:29:54PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
Admittedly I haven't checked them closely, but with my proposed patch in
he modeset_s-r branch, do we still need to adjust these? I kinda don't
want to keep the
From: Ville Syrjälä
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 38 +++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index c149426..75b46c8 100644
--- a