On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:18:58PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:27:54PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:44:09PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 03:29:54PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com > > > wrote: > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > Admittedly I haven't checked them closely, but with my proposed patch in > > > he modeset_s-r branch, do we still need to adjust these? I kinda don't > > > want to keep the legacy vga plane registers around ... > > > > I found two exceptions, well, one really. > > > > i915_disable_vga() pokes at one sequencer register. > > Ok, I think we should then only convert that register and add a comment > about it somewhere. I really hope we can get by without all this legacy > vga stuff here ...
Yeah I think the sequencer "screen off" bit is the only one the specs says we need to touch. BTW I suppose we should really touch it in i915_redisable_vga() too. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
