On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 02:53:59PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 08:35:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > No idea why con2fb_acquire_newinfo() initializes much less than
> > > fbcon_startup(), but so be it
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 08:35:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > No idea why con2fb_acquire_newinfo() initializes much less than
> > fbcon_startup(), but so be it. From a quick look most of the
> > un-initialized stuff should be fair
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> No idea why con2fb_acquire_newinfo() initializes much less than
> fbcon_startup(), but so be it. From a quick look most of the
> un-initialized stuff should be fairly harmless, but who knows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
> Cc: D
Hi Daniel,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on drm/drm-next linus/master v5.17-rc2 next-20220131]
[cannot apply to airlied/drm-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a
No idea why con2fb_acquire_newinfo() initializes much less than
fbcon_startup(), but so be it. From a quick look most of the
un-initialized stuff should be fairly harmless, but who knows.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Thomas Zimmerma
