On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:38:09PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/5/2 Daniel Vetter :
> > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:34:23AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >> 2013/4/30 Daniel Vetter :
> >> > If we ever leak a non-DP compliant port width through here, we have a
> >> > pretty serious issue. So just
2013/5/2 Daniel Vetter :
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:34:23AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> 2013/4/30 Daniel Vetter :
>> > If we ever leak a non-DP compliant port width through here, we have a
>> > pretty serious issue. So just rip out all these WARNs - if we need
>> > them it's probably better to
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:34:23AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/4/30 Daniel Vetter :
> > If we ever leak a non-DP compliant port width through here, we have a
> > pretty serious issue. So just rip out all these WARNs - if we need
> > them it's probably better to have them at a central place wh
2013/4/30 Daniel Vetter :
> If we ever leak a non-DP compliant port width through here, we have a
> pretty serious issue. So just rip out all these WARNs - if we need
> them it's probably better to have them at a central place where we
> compute the dp lane count.
>
> Also use the new DDI width mac
If we ever leak a non-DP compliant port width through here, we have a
pretty serious issue. So just rip out all these WARNs - if we need
them it's probably better to have them at a central place where we
compute the dp lane count.
Also use the new DDI width macro for FDI mode.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni
S
