Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2017-11-02 15:40:50)
> Chris Wilson writes:
>
> > In the next few patches, we will have a hard requirement that we emit a
> > context-switch to the perma-pinned i915->kernel_context (so that we can
> > save the HW state using that context-switch). As the first context
> > i
Chris Wilson writes:
> In the next few patches, we will have a hard requirement that we emit a
> context-switch to the perma-pinned i915->kernel_context (so that we can
> save the HW state using that context-switch). As the first context
> itself may be classed as a kernel context, we want to be
On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 12:42 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> In the next few patches, we will have a hard requirement that we emit a
> context-switch to the perma-pinned i915->kernel_context (so that we can
> save the HW state using that context-switch). As the first context
> itself may be classed as
In the next few patches, we will have a hard requirement that we emit a
context-switch to the perma-pinned i915->kernel_context (so that we can
save the HW state using that context-switch). As the first context
itself may be classed as a kernel context, we want to be explicit in our
comparison. For
