In the next few patches, we will have a hard requirement that we emit a
context-switch to the perma-pinned i915->kernel_context (so that we can
save the HW state using that context-switch). As the first context
itself may be classed as a kernel context, we want to be explicit in our
comparison. For an extra-layer of finesse, we can check the last
unretired context on the engine; as well as the last retired context
when idle.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
index ddbe5c9bf45a..c15e288bed02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -1587,8 +1587,20 @@ bool intel_engines_are_idle(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv)
 
 bool intel_engine_has_kernel_context(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
-       return (!engine->last_retired_context ||
-               i915_gem_context_is_kernel(engine->last_retired_context));
+       const struct i915_gem_context *kctx = engine->i915->kernel_context;
+       struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq;
+
+       lockdep_assert_held(&engine->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+
+       /* An unretired request? */
+       rq = __i915_gem_active_peek(&engine->timeline->last_request);
+       if (rq)
+               return rq->ctx == kctx;
+
+       if (!engine->last_retired_context)
+               return true;
+
+       return engine->last_retired_context == kctx;
 }
 
 void intel_engines_reset_default_submission(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
-- 
2.15.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to