Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Use short PCH names consistently

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:50:15PM +, Murthy, Arun R wrote: >> > From: Ville Syrjälä >> > >> > The comments regarding PCH compatibility use long vs. >> > short names inconsistently. Just use short names always. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjä

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Use short PCH names consistently

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:50:15PM +, Murthy, Arun R wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > The comments regarding PCH compatibility use long vs. > > short names inconsistently. Just use short names always. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c |

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Use short PCH names consistently

> From: Ville Syrjälä > > The comments regarding PCH compatibility use long vs. > short names inconsistently. Just use short names always. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c | 10 +- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --gi

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Use short PCH names consistently

From: Ville Syrjälä The comments regarding PCH compatibility use long vs. short names inconsistently. Just use short names always. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i9