> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > The comments regarding PCH compatibility use long vs. > short names inconsistently. Just use short names always. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c > index e2b2bbdc0714..94446cac6605 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ intel_pch_type(const struct drm_i915_private > *dev_priv, unsigned short id) > drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Found PantherPoint > PCH\n"); > drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, > GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) != 6 && > !IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv)); > - /* PantherPoint is CPT compatible */ > + /* PPT is CPT compatible */
This is not the code but only comment, I feel elaborated names makes it more readable than abbreviation. Thanks and Regards, Arun R Murthy --------------------
