Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Also delay first activation for SKL+

2015-11-19 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 08:44 +, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi Rodrigo, > > On 19 November 2015 at 00:39, Rodrigo Vivi > wrote: > > @@ -441,15 +438,14 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp > > *intel_dp) > > /* > > * FIXME: Activation should happen immediately since this > > f

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Also delay first activation for SKL+

2015-11-19 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Rodrigo, On 19 November 2015 at 00:39, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > @@ -441,15 +438,14 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > /* > * FIXME: Activation should happen immediately since this function > * is just called after pipe is fully trained and enabled. > -

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Also delay first activation for SKL+

2015-11-18 Thread R, Durgadoss
>-Original Message- >From: Vivi, Rodrigo >Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 6:10 AM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo; R, Durgadoss >Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Also delay first activation for SKL+ > >In certain platforms we face strange and different issues >when a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Also delay first activation for SKL+

2015-11-18 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
In certain platforms we face strange and different issues when activating PSR right after a modeset so quickly. So we delayed the first activation for the platforms where we saw the issues with 'commit d0ac896a477d ("drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation.")'. So, let's apply the same delay on first