[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce the Haswell VECS v2

2013-05-28 Thread Ben Widawsky
The primary change in this series is I introduce the ivybridge_preinstall and "Add PM regs to pre/post install" before make "PM interrupt writes non-destructive". This helps address the issue Damien caught where the PMIMR is never cleared midway through the series. On that note, I fixed a bug intro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce the Haswell VECS

2013-05-09 Thread Li, Zhong
I have run some video process test cases calling libva based on vesc-rebase kernel, output videos of video processing are ok by a little mild test cases (include de-interlacing, denoise, color space conversion and scaling). Then I used upstream kernel which not support vesc, output of vpp was wro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce the Haswell VECS

2013-05-07 Thread Ben Widawsky
I've pushed a branch with everything I got from Damien's review so far. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~bwidawsk/drm-intel/log/?h=vecs-rebase Since it appears Damien hasn't finished yet, I won't send the updated patches in case someone else comes along with more comments on those patches. Also, sin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce the Haswell VECS

2013-04-30 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:59:11 -0700 Ben Widawsky wrote: > Here is the original post with the RFC for these patches. > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2012-November/022330.html So where are we with these? They're almost old enough to drink now... I think the media team already has

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce the Haswell VECS

2013-04-27 Thread Ben Widawsky
Here is the original post with the RFC for these patches. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2012-November/022330.html I don't believe there have been any major changes in the driver code. So, what's changed since last time? I've pushed 4 patches which implement tests for the new ri