Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: force throttling/fairness

2011-10-29 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:47:04 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 09:40:57PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:22:25PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:45:34 -0700 > > > Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:07:35

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: force throttling/fairness

2011-10-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 09:40:57PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:22:25PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:45:34 -0700 > > Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:07:35 +0100, Chris Wilson > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:55:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: force throttling/fairness

2011-10-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:22:25PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:45:34 -0700 > Eric Anholt wrote: > > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:07:35 +0100, Chris Wilson > > wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:55:26 -0700, Ben Widawsky > > > wrote: > > > > These patches are pretty raw as

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: force throttling/fairness

2011-10-29 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:07:35 +0100 Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:55:26 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > These patches are pretty raw as I'm hoping to get some comments before > > working to hard too clean them up. The goal is GPU fairness for clients > > running on i915. > > The bi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: force throttling/fairness

2011-10-29 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:45:34 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:07:35 +0100, Chris Wilson > wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:55:26 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > These patches are pretty raw as I'm hoping to get some comments before > > > working to hard too clean them up. Th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: force throttling/fairness

2011-10-29 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:07:35 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:55:26 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > These patches are pretty raw as I'm hoping to get some comments before > > working to hard too clean them up. The goal is GPU fairness for clients > > running on i915. > > The b

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: force throttling/fairness

2011-10-29 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:55:26 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > These patches are pretty raw as I'm hoping to get some comments before > working to hard too clean them up. The goal is GPU fairness for clients > running on i915. The biggest danger I see is that num_outstanding is only decremented in ret

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: force throttling/fairness

2011-10-28 Thread Ben Widawsky
These patches are pretty raw as I'm hoping to get some comments before working to hard too clean them up. The goal is GPU fairness for clients running on i915. These are simplified versions of some patches which I've been working on for an internal customer. These patches are designed to keep clie