On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:07:35 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:55:26 -0700, Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> wrote: > > These patches are pretty raw as I'm hoping to get some comments before > > working to hard too clean them up. The goal is GPU fairness for clients > > running on i915. > > The biggest danger I see is that num_outstanding is only decremented > in retire_requests, which under the right circumstances (a single hog or > a plurarity) will cause latencies of over 1s. Also this unnecessarily > penalises benchmarks, i.e. a single active client.
Just using wait_request interface would require less code and not have that issue.
pgpvXVyof9bCA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
