Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: enable DOP level clock gating

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:03:24 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 05:57:08PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Rebased after new intel_pm split. This needs testing from QA to see how > > it impacts power consumption. > > > > Cc: "Zhang, Ouping" > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: enable DOP level clock gating

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 05:57:08PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Rebased after new intel_pm split. This needs testing from QA to see how > it impacts power consumption. > > Cc: "Zhang, Ouping" > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky I've seen the internal power testing results and nothing seems to change.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: enable DOP level clock gating

Rebased after new intel_pm split. This needs testing from QA to see how it impacts power consumption. Cc: "Zhang, Ouping" Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |4 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drive

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: enable DOP level clock gating for GEN7

The docs are not very clear on exactly what this means. Another doc however mentioned that [not] enabling this can significantly increase consumption impact. Some early tests show no perf regression in Nexuiz, but a fairly significant regression in OA (252FPS -> 240FPS). Unfortunately I do not ha

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: enable DOP level clock gating for GEN7

The docs are not very clear on exactly what this means. Another doc however mentioned that [not] enabling this can significantly increase consumption impact. Some early tests show no perf regression in Nexuiz, but a fairly significant regression in OA (252FPS -> 240FPS). Unfortunately I do not ha