On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:39:03 +, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:20:21 +0200, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
> > Based on a patch by Ben Widawsky, but with different colors
> > for the bikeshed.
> >
> > In contrast to Ben's patch this one doesn't add the fault regs.
> > Afaics they're
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:20:21 +0200, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> Based on a patch by Ben Widawsky, but with different colors
> for the bikeshed.
>
> In contrast to Ben's patch this one doesn't add the fault regs.
> Afaics they're for the optional page fault support which
> - we're not enabling
> - and
Based on a patch by Ben Widawsky, but with different colors
for the bikeshed.
In contrast to Ben's patch this one doesn't add the fault regs.
Afaics they're for the optional page fault support which
- we're not enabling
- and which seems to be unsupported by the hw team. Recent bspec
lacks tons
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:30:12 +0200, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> Based on a patch by Ben Widawsky, but with different colors
> for the bikeshed.
>
> In contrast to Ben's patch this one doesn't add the fault regs.
> Afaics they're for the optional page fault support which
> - we're not enabling
> - and
Based on a patch by Ben Widawsky, but with different colors
for the bikeshed.
In contrast to Ben's patch this one doesn't add the fault regs.
Afaics they're for the optional page fault support which
- we're not enabling
- and which seems to be unsupported by the hw team. Recent bspec
lacks tons
