On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 10:26:54PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:01:56 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > Docs say that the secure batchbuffer field for > SNB B0 (products that
> > actually shipped) should be 0 when not using PPGTT. I'd guess this has
> > no positive or negative
On Oct 5, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:01:56 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> Docs say that the secure batchbuffer field for > SNB B0 (products that
>> actually shipped) should be 0 when not using PPGTT. I'd guess this has
>> no positive or negative effect, but is
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:26:54 +0100
Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:01:56 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > Docs say that the secure batchbuffer field for > SNB B0 (products that
> > actually shipped) should be 0 when not using PPGTT. I'd guess this has
> > no positive or negative effec
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:01:56 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Docs say that the secure batchbuffer field for > SNB B0 (products that
> actually shipped) should be 0 when not using PPGTT. I'd guess this has
> no positive or negative effect, but is just here to jive with the docs.
How explicit is the w
Docs say that the secure batchbuffer field for > SNB B0 (products that
actually shipped) should be 0 when not using PPGTT. I'd guess this has
no positive or negative effect, but is just here to jive with the docs.
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
