Starting with SandyBridge (though possible with earlier hacked BIOSes),
the BIOS may initialise the IGFX as secondary to a discrete GPU. Prior,
it would simply disable the integrated GPU. So we adjust the our PCI
class mask to match any DISPLAY_CLASS device.
In such a configuration, the IGFX is no
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:49:59 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Chris Wilson
>> wrote:
>> > Starting with SandyBridge (though possible with earlier hacked BIOSes),
>> > the BIOS may initialise the IGFX as seconda
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:49:59 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > Starting with SandyBridge (though possible with earlier hacked BIOSes),
> > the BIOS may initialise the IGFX as secondary to a discrete GPU. Prior,
> > it would simply disable the
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Starting with SandyBridge (though possible with earlier hacked BIOSes),
> the BIOS may initialise the IGFX as secondary to a discrete GPU. Prior,
> it would simply disable the integrated GPU. In such a configuration, the
> IGFX is not a primar
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:04:16 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:07:07 +, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
> > + if (dev_priv->is_vga) {
> > + /* If we have > 1 VGA cards with a single output,
> > +* then disable the radeon VGA resources.
> > +*/
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:07:07 +, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> + if (dev_priv->is_vga) {
> + /* If we have > 1 VGA cards with a single output,
> + * then disable the radeon VGA resources.
> + */
Why does this say 'radeon'?
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgp4
Starting with SandyBridge (though possible with earlier hacked BIOSes),
the BIOS may initialise the IGFX as secondary to a discrete GPU. Prior,
it would simply disable the integrated GPU. In such a configuration, the
IGFX is not a primary VGA controller and so should not take part in VGA
arbitratio
