On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 16:43:30 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Fixes an Ironlake laptop with a 68.940MHz 1280x800 panel and 120MHz SSC
> reference clock.
>
> More generally, the 0.488% tolerance used before is just too tight to
> reliably find a PLL setting. I extracted the search algorithm and
> mod
Any idea whether this will be applied or not? We find that it resolves
a bug for Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/554569?comments=all
Thanks,
Steve Conklin
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2010.07.02 16:43:30 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> Fixe
On 2010.07.02 16:43:30 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Fixes an Ironlake laptop with a 68.940MHz 1280x800 panel and 120MHz SSC
> reference clock.
This should fix #27471 too. I was hesitating if enlarge error range
or always choose the one with smallest error, as what we can tell from
our PLL sheet is
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:43 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Worst dotclock for Ironlake DAC refclk is 35kHz (error 0.00571)
> Worst dotclock for Ironlake SL-LVDS refclk is 102321kHz (error 0.00524)
> Worst dotclock for Ironlake DL-LVDS refclk is 219642kHz (error 0.00488)
> Worst dotclock for Iron
Fixes an Ironlake laptop with a 68.940MHz 1280x800 panel and 120MHz SSC
reference clock.
More generally, the 0.488% tolerance used before is just too tight to
reliably find a PLL setting. I extracted the search algorithm and
modified it to find the dot clocks with maximum error over the valid
ran
