Any idea whether this will be applied or not? We find that it resolves a bug for Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/554569?comments=all Thanks, Steve Conklin On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Zhenyu Wang <zhen...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 2010.07.02 16:43:30 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: >> Fixes an Ironlake laptop with a 68.940MHz 1280x800 panel and 120MHz SSC >> reference clock. > > This should fix #27471 too. I was hesitating if enlarge error range > or always choose the one with smallest error, as what we can tell from > our PLL sheet is just error result between real freq and recommended value, > but not max error range. > > Would you cc stable too? > > thanks. > > -- > Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. > > $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkwyhP0ACgkQsQQaM014GCf4YQCfYr3s36s0nrFNh9Y2fffl4bfJ > E/kAn2X2bfL+r8gshWb/M98ldAULFIZn > =8HF4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
