On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 22:57:33 +0100, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:21:59 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > With the drm fix to not re-dpms the crtc, is this one still needed?
>
> No. I had to disable both this and Dave Airlie's double dpms defense, but
> with the drm crtc dpms fix thi
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:21:59 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 08:12:12 +0100, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > At the moment, we have a habit of occasionally performing a double dpms
> > on. This confuses the FDI link training performed on a dpms on as we can
> > only adjust the settings
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 08:12:12 +0100, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> At the moment, we have a habit of occasionally performing a double dpms
> on. This confuses the FDI link training performed on a dpms on as we can
> only adjust the settings whilst the link is disabled and the second
> attempt at training
At the moment, we have a habit of occasionally performing a double dpms
on. This confuses the FDI link training performed on a dpms on as we can
only adjust the settings whilst the link is disabled and the second
attempt at training fails. A simple defensive workaround is to always
disable the link
