On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:21:59 -0700, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 08:12:12 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > wrote: > > At the moment, we have a habit of occasionally performing a double dpms > > on. This confuses the FDI link training performed on a dpms on as we can > > only adjust the settings whilst the link is disabled and the second > > attempt at training fails. A simple defensive workaround is to always > > disable the link prior to adjustment and re-enabling on dpms on. > > With the drm fix to not re-dpms the crtc, is this one still needed?
No. I had to disable both this and Dave Airlie's double dpms defense, but with the drm crtc dpms fix this patch is no longer required. -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
