On 17/11/15 14:52, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 09:53:35AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:41:18PM +0530, Kumar, Mahesh wrote:
In case of Y-Tiling, "plane_blocks_per_line" calculation is different
than X/None-Tiling
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 09:53:35AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:41:18PM +0530, Kumar, Mahesh wrote:
>> > In case of Y-Tiling, "plane_blocks_per_line" calculation is different
>> > than X/None-Tiling case.
>> > This patch correct
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 09:53:35AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:41:18PM +0530, Kumar, Mahesh wrote:
> > In case of Y-Tiling, "plane_blocks_per_line" calculation is different
> > than X/None-Tiling case.
> > This patch corrects this calculation according to Bspec.
> > plane
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:41:18PM +0530, Kumar, Mahesh wrote:
> In case of Y-Tiling, "plane_blocks_per_line" calculation is different
> than X/None-Tiling case.
> This patch corrects this calculation according to Bspec.
> plane blocks per line = Plane memory format is Y tile ?
> ceil
In case of Y-Tiling, "plane_blocks_per_line" calculation is different
than X/None-Tiling case.
This patch corrects this calculation according to Bspec.
plane blocks per line = Plane memory format is Y tile ?
ceiling[4 * plane bytes per line / 512]/4 :
ceiling
