On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:38:44 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> This should be a small power savings. Tested on Lenovo T410 (Ironlake), LVDS
> VGA and DisplayPort, up to 1920x1200R.
>
> v2: Add Sandybridge support, fix obvious math error.
>
> Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang
> Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
Appl
On 2010.04.12 11:38:44 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> This should be a small power savings. Tested on Lenovo T410 (Ironlake), LVDS
> VGA and DisplayPort, up to 1920x1200R.
>
> v2: Add Sandybridge support, fix obvious math error.
Tested on Sandybridge/CPT, no regression found, but didn't do
power sa
This should be a small power savings. Tested on Lenovo T410 (Ironlake), LVDS
VGA and DisplayPort, up to 1920x1200R.
v2: Add Sandybridge support, fix obvious math error.
Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 26 --
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 17:03 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2010.04.09 17:55:10 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > This should be a small power savings, but the Watts-Up I used to test is
> > only precise to within 100mW. Tested on Lenovo T410 (Ironlake), LVDS
> > VGA and DisplayPort, up to 1920x1200R.
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 05:55 +0800, Adam Jackson wrote:
> This should be a small power savings, but the Watts-Up I used to test is
> only precise to within 100mW. Tested on Lenovo T410 (Ironlake), LVDS
> VGA and DisplayPort, up to 1920x1200R.
Very good point.
I test this patch on another laptop.
On 2010.04.09 17:55:10 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> This should be a small power savings, but the Watts-Up I used to test is
> only precise to within 100mW. Tested on Lenovo T410 (Ironlake), LVDS
> VGA and DisplayPort, up to 1920x1200R.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
Nice work for per crtc FDI
