On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 17:03 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > On 2010.04.09 17:55:10 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > This should be a small power savings, but the Watts-Up I used to test is > > only precise to within 100mW. Tested on Lenovo T410 (Ironlake), LVDS > > VGA and DisplayPort, up to 1920x1200R. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> > > Nice work for per crtc FDI lane config! We might have some limit on future > hw for FDI lane number, in consider of the introduction with the third pipe, > but this one is true for all current systems.
Yeah, I'm not really sure how to handle that. My instinct is to just
limit the maximum pixel clock for those pipes during mode validation.
> Adam, this should be a d-i-n patch right? I've changed FDI link setting for
> Sandybridge on that branch, so please rebase onto that. This should also apply
> true for SNB/CPT system, I'll give it a testing.
It was against d-i-n as of:
drm/i915: Remove dead KMS encoder save/restore code.
Rebase coming in a moment.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
