>> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wilson, Chris P
> >> ; Vivi, Rodrigo
> >> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: Dump i915 children
> >> runtime status
> >>
> >> On Fri, 01 Apr 2022, "Gupta, Anshuman"
>
la
>> >> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 5:31 PM
>> >> To: Dixit, Ashutosh ; Gupta, Anshuman
>> >>
>> >> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wilson, Chris P
>> >> ; Vivi, Rodrigo
>> >> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: Dump i915 ch
>> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wilson, Chris P
> >> ; Vivi, Rodrigo
> >> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: Dump i915 children
> >> runtime status
> >>
> >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022, "Dixit, Ashutosh" wrote:
> >>
>> Vivi, Rodrigo
>> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: Dump i915 children runtime
>> status
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022, "Dixit, Ashutosh" wrote:
>> > On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 03:22:27 -0700, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
>> >&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Jani Nikula
> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 5:31 PM
> To: Dixit, Ashutosh ; Gupta, Anshuman
>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wilson, Chris P
> ;
> Vivi, Rodrigo
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022, "Dixit, Ashutosh" wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 03:22:27 -0700, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +static int i915_runtime_dump_child_status(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> +struct seq_file *m = data;
>> +const char *rpm_status;
>> +
>> +/* E
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 03:22:27 -0700, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int i915_runtime_dump_child_status(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct seq_file *m = data;
> + const char *rpm_status;
> +
> + /* Early return if runtime_pm is disabled */
> + if (d
On 28-03-2022 15:52, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
i915 doesn't use pm_suspend_ignore_children() which warrants that
any runtime active child of i915 will block the runtime suspend
of i915.
i915_runtime_pm_status only exposes i915 runtime pm usage_count,
which is not sufficient to debug in the scenari
i915 doesn't use pm_suspend_ignore_children() which warrants that
any runtime active child of i915 will block the runtime suspend
of i915.
i915_runtime_pm_status only exposes i915 runtime pm usage_count,
which is not sufficient to debug in the scenarios when i915 has
zero usage_count but there are
