On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 03:22:27 -0700, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int i915_runtime_dump_child_status(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct seq_file *m = data;
> + const char *rpm_status;
> +
> + /* Early return if runtime_pm is disabled */
> + if (dev->power.disable_depth)
> + return 0;
> +
> + switch (dev->power.runtime_status) {
> + case RPM_SUSPENDED:
> + rpm_status = "suspended";
> + break;
> + case RPM_SUSPENDING:
> + rpm_status = "suspending";
> + break;
> + case RPM_RESUMING:
> + rpm_status = "resuming";
> + break;
> + case RPM_ACTIVE:
> + rpm_status = "active";
> + break;
> + default:
> + rpm_status = "unknown";
> + }
> +
> + seq_printf(m, "\t%s %s: Runtime status: %s\n", dev_driver_string(dev),
> + dev_name(dev), rpm_status);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
Maybe a nit, but perhaps defining a const array is better than having a
switch statement? Similar to what is done in rtpm_status_str(). The
function itself is very similar to rtpm_status_str() so can probably
benefit from that similarity. Can perhaps even be nearly identical to
rtpm_status_str() (since that is static in the genpd (generic power domain)
code).
See also 2bd5306a8764 ("PM / Domains: add debugfs listing of struct
generic_pm_domain-s"), though I am not sure if genpd's are applicable in
our case and certainly look way out of scope for now. Thanks.
> +
> static int i915_runtime_pm_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
> @@ -500,6 +534,10 @@ static int i915_runtime_pm_status(struct seq_file *m,
> void *unused)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> seq_printf(m, "Usage count: %d\n",
> atomic_read(&dev_priv->drm.dev->power.usage_count));
> + seq_printf(m, "Runtime active children: %d\n",
> + atomic_read(&dev_priv->drm.dev->power.child_count));
> + device_for_each_child(&pdev->dev, m, i915_runtime_dump_child_status);
> +
> #else
> seq_printf(m, "Device Power Management (CONFIG_PM) disabled\n");
> #endif
> --
> 2.26.2
>
