Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

2015-07-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 02:11:12PM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote: > > > On 7/6/2015 2:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:23:53AM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote: > >>Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. > >>Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred lik

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

2015-07-06 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 02:31:56PM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote: > > > On 7/6/2015 2:19 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:23:53AM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote: > >> Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. > >> Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

2015-07-06 Thread shuang . he
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) Task id: 6723 -Summary- Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied ILK

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

2015-07-06 Thread Jindal, Sonika
On 7/6/2015 2:19 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:23:53AM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote: Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other interrupts. Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal --- Hi, I see we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

2015-07-06 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:23:53AM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote: > Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. > Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other > interrupts. > > Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal > --- > Hi, > > I see we don't check for hotplug_trig

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

2015-07-06 Thread Jindal, Sonika
On 7/6/2015 2:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:23:53AM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote: Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other interrupts. Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal --- Hi, I see we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

2015-07-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:23:53AM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote: > Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. > Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other > interrupts. > > Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal > --- > Hi, > > I see we don't check for hotplug_trig

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

2015-07-05 Thread Sonika Jindal
Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other interrupts. Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal --- Hi, I see we don't check for hotplug_trigger before processing the HPD for any of the platform. Is there any reason for t