Robert Navarro gmail.com> writes:
>
> Finally got around to compiling this for my system, there were a few issues
> with the build scripts on the latest Ubuntu.
>
> Currently running 3.15.0-rc3-custom-drm-intel-nightly-bug70254+ with no
> issues thus far.
>
> I&#
Ville Syrjälä linux.intel.com> writes:
>
> Replace.
>
Finally got around to compiling this for my system, there were a few issues
with the build scripts on the latest Ubuntu.
Currently running 3.15.0-rc3-custom-drm-intel-nightly-bug70254+ with no
issues thus far.
I'll give a few more days
Ville Syrjälä linux.intel.com> writes:
> I think it should apply to 3.13+. If not directly then with a bit of
> manual frobbery. Which reminds me that we should perhaps slap a cc
> stable on it to get it included in 3.13+. For older kernels the patch
> would have to look totally different, so I'm
Thanks for this Ville.
Should this apply to 3.14 and 3.15?
I'll try it on 3.15 first and report back.
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Runyan, Arthur J intel.com> writes:
>
> Please check the DRAM configuration for the systems that fail. The higher
latency is more likely with
> higher tRFC which is mainly found with 8 Gbit components.
>
What other information do we need to get this included?
The DRAM config, is this someth
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Robert Navarro wrote:
I too am having the same issue. I'm running on kernel 3.12.6 (just updated)
>
> The issue happens less frequently, but it still happens and it's quite
> annoying.
>
> Previously I would just get lines lik
624.450177] [drm:i915_gem_context_destroy_ioctl], HW context 1 destroyed
I have a bug open for this, but I haven't heard a response on next steps
unfortunately :(
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70254
--
Robert Navarro
___
Intel-gfx mailing
