But isn't this a decision to be made by the mainline maintainers?
Obviously, but why shouldn't they reject a widely requested feature when
the code is mature enough?
There was nothing ever rejected, as no patch was ever recieved. So I was
told on the MPlayer-users mailing list. MPlayer deve
Am 28.05.2012 12:46, schrieb Niccolò Belli:
Il 28/05/2012 08:14, Oliver Seitz ha scritto:
Is this true? I've seen no changes for a long time. I thought maybe
maintainers see no need to work on software that does it's job. I would
be very sorry if it was really dead.
No need? What ab
Am 26.05.2012 17:05, schrieb Niccolò Belli:
[..] no one is going to maintain mplayer-vaapi anymore [...]
Is this true? I've seen no changes for a long time. I thought maybe
maintainers see no need to work on software that does it's job. I would
be very sorry if it was really dead.
Greets,
K
I'm using an ASUS Eeebox B202 so I don't have the option of adding a
different video card. I'm not quite sure what you mean by modifying
hardware but replacing the B202 defeats the purpose of trying to use it
in the first place. Are you suggesting I avoid Intel graphics cards for
this type of se
Am 17.05.2012 15:36, schrieb Carl Hunter:
On 5/17/2012 7:56 AM, The Fungi wrote:
On 2012-05-17 07:22:38 +0200 (+0200), Oliver Seitz wrote:
[...]
But, if a monitor is connected but turned off, the monitor should
be configured anyway. The EDID transmitting device inside the
monitor is powered by
Am 16.05.2012 21:48, schrieb Carl Hunter:
I'm trying to set my xorg.conf file up so that I get a specific
resolution when my monitor is turned off and I reboot my PC. lspci shows
that I've got a 945GME and Xorg.0.log shows that I'm using version
2.17.0 of the Intel driver. I'm running Mythbuntu 1
To reduce contrast to 75%, you can use
xrandr --output --gamma 0.75:0.75:0.75
Ok, sorry, gamma is not the same as contrast. But gamma can be used to
achieve similar shifts of the relation of dark to bright colors, so it
might be suitable to get the desired effect here.
Greets,
Kiste
Hi! I'm no real expert, but I dare to guess some answers anyway...
Will there ever be a Control Center like the Windows version ?
Probably not. It is not the job of a driver to communicate with the
user. GUIs are made by other people. Your desktop environment could
provide such a tool.
To
Hi, perhaps one of the experts can answer this in a few words...
SandyBridge can prevent tearing only by using pageflipping.
pageflipping on Xorg always flips the whole framebuffer, so it can only
be synced to one output device.
The vaapi-enabled MPlayer plays nice in fullscreen mode (via vaa
Video tearing in windows is a known issue on SandyBridge
And also on IvyBridge, I presume. Then I'll try to be patient until
there's a new implementation of vsynced update logic in the driver :-)
Thanks for the explanations and all the good work!
Kiste
_
The only workaround is [...] to only use fullscreen DRI video applications
(OpenGL or libva decoders) that use SwapBuffers.
Yes, works perfectly while only one screen is connected. That means,
this definition of "fullscreen" is "the whole framebuffer", and not "the
content of one display"?
Hello,
I'm running vaapi-mplayer on debian wheezy, which has fairly up-to-date
intel drivers. (Right now i965-va-driver is outdated, so I use the sid
package of that.)
I do not have any window manager, only X and an xterm. (Really, not even
twm. It is only a test installation.)
Both output
Please, can anyone tell me if there is a list for user questions about
VAAPI? I have several questions...
Greets,
Kiste
Am 09.03.2012 08:04, schrieb Oliver Seitz:
Hi!
I'm using the patched, VA-API enabled MPlayer on SandyBridge. System is
Debian Wheezy. Works great, decodes BluRay
How could this be implemented in a clean way? Of course forcing LVDS on
should become a parameter,
A patch for this was made some time ago, but it was not accepted in the
end. Concerns were that using those force-parameters could be advertised
in internet forums and people use them accidenta
Hi!
I'm using the patched, VA-API enabled MPlayer on SandyBridge. System is
Debian Wheezy. Works great, decodes BluRay-like quality with neglectable
CPU load (below 5%).
Now, I'm trying to adjust brightness. I think I've read that VA-API
defines a brightness property, but MPlayer can not set
Am 08.02.2012 10:55, schrieb Graeme Russ:
Hi Oliver,
On 02/08/2012 08:28 PM, Oliver Seitz wrote:
$ xrandr --output HDMI1 --mode 1680x1050
Will set the display mode properly, but the gnome menu bar (normally on the
bottom) appears in the middle of the screen and logging of reverts back
This
$ xrandr --output HDMI1 --mode 1680x1050
Will set the display mode properly, but the gnome menu bar (normally on the
bottom) appears in the middle of the screen and logging of reverts back
This is a gnome thing, then. Try switching off VGA completly, gnome
might then adopt to the higher resolu
Hello,
this list is mainly about development and issues in the newest driver
version. If you can, please try at least the latest (11.10) ubuntu
version. In case the problems don't exist anymore in 11.10, it is more
an ubuntu problem than an intel driver problem.
Greets,
Kiste
hello guys,
On 10.08.2011 20:16, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2011/08/10 19:58 (GMT+0200) Oliver Seitz composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
On 2011/08/10 14:15 (GMT+0200) Oliver Seitz composed:
Configuration of software is not done through conf files anymore, it is
done using hardware. If autodetection gives
On 10.08.2011 18:21, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2011/08/10 14:15 (GMT+0200) Oliver Seitz composed:
Configuration of software is not done through conf files anymore, it is
done using hardware. If autodetection gives values you do not want, you
have to alter the hardware.
I can't imagine p
EDID reports a refresh range of 58-62 Hertz which I overrode in xorg.conf.
I've learned that overriding detected values is discouraged. The
prefered solution would be to alter the EDID data in your display
harwdare or insert a special EDID sending device in the monitor cable.
Configuration
video=LVDS-1:e
Unfortunately this didn't enable the LVDS output (at least xrandr doesn't show
it as an available output with a default boot - ie no xorg customization).
Does this require an xorg.conf for the output to show up?
Some months ago I've tried that, I also had no success, with o
2) If there is a valid reason for 1, how can I force the output to be
listed.
Short answer: You can't.
It is being discussed to implement kernel parameters to force a certain
LVDS mode, abd there do exist some patches. But as much as I know there
hasn't been a decision made if it e
Hi Chris, have you updated this patch?
I think this patch may be obsolete, as these patches
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2011-March/009583.html
do the same and much more. It is not clear yet how to prevent users from
accidentally using these functions which will make the
Am I missing something, or does KMS only accept the BIOS provided panel timings?
There is a patch pending about setting LVDS parameters by hand if no or
incorrect display data is present. But the controlling options are still
being discussed as I understand it.
Greets,
Kiste
__
I'd very much appreciate it if these could please be merged into
drm/i915. The changes are not complex and should be easy to follow.
I have the feeling that these patches may also help on this topic:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2011-February/009376.html
Chris Wilson suppli
So it sounds not that special regarding graphics, but more like
standard hardware.
The part of the hardware the graphics drivers have to deal with, yes. So
now I'm sure i915 is the right driver, not intelfb.
Thanks again!
Kiste
___
Intel-gfx mail
I have not found out how to actually use that patch, I had no
success in activating the LVDS output.
This seems to be the wrong list for user questions, but I *did* search
the web and found no better place... Could perhaps please someone point
me to the right place for this kind of questions
Why would you want to use intelfb?
I think Julien meant that intelfb should not be used except for special
embedded hardware. It's recommended to use KMS and its drmfb.
Ah,ok, the application indeed resemles an embedded system: It's always
the same motherboard connected to the same LVDS pan
I'm sorry, I'm still too stupid...
I've (hopefully) applied the patch to 2.6.37-release and configured i915
to be compiled in the kernel with modesetting by default. KMS works for
VGA, and resolution can be set like "video=1024x768"
But I have not found out how to actually use that patch, I h
On 13.02.2011 11:34, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:50:07 +0100, Oliver Seitz wrote:
Hi.
I can not make intelfb run on intel board D945GSEJT. I've tried a
very clean setup, here's what I've done:
Why would you want to use intelfb?
I did not want to use X,
Oh, it seems like I used the wrong driver. intelfb seems to support only
i965 up, so for i945 I seem to have to use i915. I'll try again.
Greets,
Kiste
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/list
Hi.
I can not make intelfb run on intel board D945GSEJT. I've tried a very
clean setup, here's what I've done:
> Install a minimal debian squeeze (stable)
$ wget http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.37.tar.bz2
$ tar -xf linux-2.6.37.tar.bz2
$ cd linux-2-6-37
$ make defconfig
Wow, that was quick!
But... Sorry for me being ignorant... How can I test it? What should I
apply the patch on? drm-intel-kernel?
Thanks!
Kiste
P.S.: @ Chris Wilson: Sorry, the private mail was sent accidentally.
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gf
Hello list!
I'm using intel D945GSEJT boards, connected to industrial LVDS panels
without EDID or the like.
On debian 5.0 this did work when disabling kms (parameter "nomodeset").
When running X, LVDS could be enabled using xrandr.
Now, on debian 6.0, LVDS output does not show up in xrandr'
35 matches
Mail list logo
