Re: [Intel-gfx] PROBLEM: i915 modesetting - weird offset graphics (v2.6.37-rc1-27-gff8b16d)

2010-11-11 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:02 +0100, Maciej Rutecki wrote: > On czwartek, 4 listopada 2010 o 08:25:58 Jon Masters wrote: > > Folks, > > > > I upgraded the userspace on my EeePC 1015PEM netbook to the latest > > Fedora (F15) rawhide and booted a custom kernel in order t

[Intel-gfx] [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix LVDS fixed-mode regression from 219adae1]

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
, > which sometimes is wide of the mark. > > Reported-by: Jon Masters > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson I have tested this patch, and my LVDS panel display on this Eee PC 1015PEM is now working correctly :) Obviously I suspect others will be affected in due course, so hopefully this can

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 12:13 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:29:09 -0500, Jon Masters > wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:22 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > > As I mentioned on IRC, I'm familiar with how I2C works electrically, and > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 12:13 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:29:09 -0500, Jon Masters > wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:22 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > > As I mentioned on IRC, I'm familiar with how I2C works electrically, and > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 11:33 +, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > On 8 November 2010 10:54, Jon Masters wrote: > > > > Here is the EDID output after booting: > > > > [...@monticello ~]$ hexdump /sys/class/drm/card0-LVDS-1/edid > > 000 ff00 00ff 642

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:29 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:22 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 05:54 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > > > > Here is the EDID output after booting: > > > > > > [...@monticello ~]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 11:26 +, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > On 8 November 2010 10:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:18:32 -0500, Jon Masters > > wrote: > >> Hi Chris, > >> > >> The following patch that you recently committed bre

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:22 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 05:54 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > > Here is the EDID output after booting: > > > > [...@monticello ~]$ hexdump /sys/class/drm/card0-LVDS-1/edid > > 000 ff00 00ff 6422 0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 05:54 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > Here is the EDID output after booting: > > [...@monticello ~]$ hexdump /sys/class/drm/card0-LVDS-1/edid > 000 ff00 00ff 6422 03e9 8544 0001 > 010 141c 0301 1680 780d 860a 9426 5157 2790 > 020 4f21 0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 10:27 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:18:32 -0500, Jon Masters > wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > The following patch that you recently committed breaks my ASUS Eee PC > > 1015PEM by causing the display to be offset by about

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 05:18 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > The following patch that you recently committed breaks my ASUS Eee PC > 1015PEM by causing the display to be offset by about 1 inch (a few > centimeters) when the mode is (re)set during boot. I previously posted > both photograp

[Intel-gfx] [bisected] offset display bug in i915

2010-11-08 Thread Jon Masters
Hi Chris, The following patch that you recently committed breaks my ASUS Eee PC 1015PEM by causing the display to be offset by about 1 inch (a few centimeters) when the mode is (re)set during boot. I previously posted both photographs and video of the problem in another "PROBLEM" thread. Here is

Re: [Intel-gfx] PROBLEM: i915 modesetting - weird offset graphics (v2.6.37-rc1-27-gff8b16d)

2010-11-05 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 03:29 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 03:25 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > > I upgraded the userspace on my EeePC 1015PEM netbook to the latest > > Fedora (F15) rawhide and booted a custom kernel in order to test both > > the RC1 an

Re: [Intel-gfx] PROBLEM: i915 modesetting - weird offset graphics (v2.6.37-rc1-27-gff8b16d)

2010-11-05 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 18:14 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:41 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:37:01 -0400, Jon Masters > > wrote: > > > Also, the intel-gfx list is moderated with auto-rejection. Do I really > > > need

Re: [Intel-gfx] PROBLEM: i915 modesetting - weird offset graphics (v2.6.37-rc1-27-gff8b16d)

2010-11-04 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:41 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:37:01 -0400, Jon Masters > wrote: > > Also, the intel-gfx list is moderated with auto-rejection. Do I really > > need to subscribe to the list just to get a mail through? > > A few of the In