Re: [PATCH v8 01/14] drm: Define histogram structures exposed to user

2025-02-17 Thread Murthy, Arun R
On 17-02-2025 22:56, Simona Vetter wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 12:08:08PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: Hi Arun, this whole series seems to be missing all the UAPI docs for the DRM ReST files, e.g. drm-kms.rst. The UAPI header doc comments are not a replacement for them, I would assume both

Re: [PATCH v8 01/14] drm: Define histogram structures exposed to user

2025-02-17 Thread Murthy, Arun R
On 17-02-2025 15:38, Pekka Paalanen wrote: Hi Arun, this whole series seems to be missing all the UAPI docs for the DRM ReST files, e.g. drm-kms.rst. The UAPI header doc comments are not a replacement for them, I would assume both are a requirement. Without the ReST docs it is really difficult

✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/{i915,xe}: Move intel_pch under display

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/{i915,xe}: Move intel_pch under display URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144988/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16147 -> Patchwork_144988v1

✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/{i915,xe}: Move intel_pch under display

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/{i915,xe}: Move intel_pch under display URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144988/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim sparse failed Sparse version: v0.6.2 Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately.

✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/{i915,xe}: Move intel_pch under display

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/{i915,xe}: Move intel_pch under display URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144988/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim checkpatch failed 0af56b324b0e drm/{i915,xe}: Move intel_pch under display -:36: WARNING:FILE_PATH

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display: Convert intel_pch towards intel_display

2025-02-17 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Now that intel_pch lives under display, let's begin its conversion towards struct intel_display. Move the pch_type to inside intel_display and convert the callers. While doing it, sort intel_display_core.h include list alphabetically. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi --- .../gpu/drm/i915/display/in

[PATCH 1/2] drm/{i915,xe}: Move intel_pch under display

2025-02-17 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
The only usage of the "PCH" infra is to detect which South Display Engine we should be using. Move it under display so we can convert all its callers towards intel_display struct later. No functional or code change. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile

✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: Fix 128b/132b modeset issues

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/dp: Fix 128b/132b modeset issues URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144984/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16146 -> Patchwork_144984v1 Summary --- **SU

✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/dp: Fix 128b/132b modeset issues

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/dp: Fix 128b/132b modeset issues URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144984/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim sparse failed Sparse version: v0.6.2 Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately. +./arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:

✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: Fix 128b/132b modeset issues

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/dp: Fix 128b/132b modeset issues URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144984/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim checkpatch failed bbebbc2407b5 drm/i915/dp: Fix error handling during 128b/132b link training -:55: WARNING:MISSING_FIXES_TAG:

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix disabling the transcoder function in 128b/132b mode

2025-02-17 Thread Imre Deak
During disabling the transcoder in DP 128b/132b mode (both in case of an MST master transcoder and in case of SST) the transcoder function must be first disabled without changing any other field in the register (in particular leaving the DDI port and mode select fields unchanged) and clearing the D

[PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix error handling during 128b/132b link training

2025-02-17 Thread Imre Deak
At the end of a 128b/132b link training sequence, the HW expects the transcoder training pattern to be set to TPS2 and from that to normal mode (disabling the training pattern). Transitioning from TPS1 directly to normal mode leaves the transcoder in a stuck state, resulting in page-flip timeouts l

[PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix 128b/132b modeset issues

2025-02-17 Thread Imre Deak
This patchset fixes an issue during the error handling of a 128b/132b mode link training failure and fixes the transcoder function disabling sequence in 128b/132b SST mode. Cc: Jani Nikula Imre Deak (2): drm/i915/dp: Fix error handling during 128b/132b link training drm/i915/dp: Fix disablin

Re: [PATCH v8 01/14] drm: Define histogram structures exposed to user

2025-02-17 Thread Simona Vetter
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 06:26:17PM +0100, Simona Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 12:08:08PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > Hi Arun, > > > > this whole series seems to be missing all the UAPI docs for the DRM > > ReST files, e.g. drm-kms.rst. The UAPI header doc comments are not a > > rep

✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for Improve type-safety on POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros (rev3)

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: Improve type-safety on POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144726/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16146 -> Patchwork_144726v3 Summary ---

✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Improve type-safety on POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros (rev3)

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: Improve type-safety on POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144726/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim sparse failed Sparse version: v0.6.2 Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately.

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915/display: Convert POWER_DOMAIN_*() to functions

2025-02-17 Thread Gustavo Sousa
Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2025-02-17 17:46:27-03:00) >On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:34:28PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: >> We already have other functions to get power domain for other things >> (i.e. intel_display_power_*_domain()). Convert POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros >> to the same standard. >> >> Cc: Vil

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/display: Make POWER_DOMAIN_*() always result in enum intel_display_power_domain

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:34:27PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: > In the hope of contributing to type safety in our code, let's ensure > that the type returned by the POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros is always of type > enum intel_display_power_domain. > > v2: > - Remove accidental +1 in definition of POW

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/display: Use explicit base values in POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:34:26PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: > Although we have comments in intel_display_limits.h saying that the > code expects PIPE_A and TRANSCODER_A to be zero, it doesn't hurt to add > them as explicit base values for calculating the power domain offset in > POWER_DOMAIN_*()

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915/display: Convert POWER_DOMAIN_*() to functions

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:34:28PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: > We already have other functions to get power domain for other things > (i.e. intel_display_power_*_domain()). Convert POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros > to the same standard. > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa > --- > > N

✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/{i915, xe}/display: Move dsm registration under intel_driver

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/{i915, xe}/display: Move dsm registration under intel_driver URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144975/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16146 -> Patchwork_144975v1

[PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/display: Make POWER_DOMAIN_*() always result in enum intel_display_power_domain

2025-02-17 Thread Gustavo Sousa
In the hope of contributing to type safety in our code, let's ensure that the type returned by the POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros is always of type enum intel_display_power_domain. v2: - Remove accidental +1 in definition of POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE(). (Jani) Cc: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa --

[PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915/display: Convert POWER_DOMAIN_*() to functions

2025-02-17 Thread Gustavo Sousa
We already have other functions to get power domain for other things (i.e. intel_display_power_*_domain()). Convert POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros to the same standard. Cc: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa --- Note: Maybe this patch could be squashed with the previous one. drivers/gpu/drm/

[PATCH v3 0/3] Improve type-safety on POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros

2025-02-17 Thread Gustavo Sousa
Fix one issue[1] reported by the kernel test robot and also take this opportunity to improve POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros by making them explicitly return the expected enum type with patch #2 and then turning them into function with #3. Patch #3 could be squashed into #2, but I'll defer that to reviewe

[PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/display: Use explicit base values in POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros

2025-02-17 Thread Gustavo Sousa
Although we have comments in intel_display_limits.h saying that the code expects PIPE_A and TRANSCODER_A to be zero, it doesn't hurt to add them as explicit base values for calculating the power domain offset in POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros. On the plus side, we have that this: * Fixes a warning repo

Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/i915: Introduce i915_error_regs

2025-02-17 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 09:00:45AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Introduce i915_error_regs as the EIR/EMR counterpart > to the IIR/IMR/IER i915_irq_regs, and update the irq > reset/postingstall to utilize them accordingly. > > v2: Include xe compat versions > > Reviewed-

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/display: Use display variable in intel_bw.c

2025-02-17 Thread Gustavo Sousa
Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2025-02-17 14:44:39-03:00) >On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 12:35:23PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: >> Update intel_bw.c to use a "display" variable to refer to members of the >> display struct. While this change does not move that file to completely >> use struct intel_display as par

[PATCH] drm/{i915, xe}/display: Move dsm registration under intel_driver

2025-02-17 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Move dsm register/unregister calls from the drivers to under intel_display_driver register/unregister. v2: Rebase only Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 4 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c

✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe/display: Move display runtime suspend to a later point (rev2)

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/xe/display: Move display runtime suspend to a later point (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144901/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16146 -> Patchwork_144901v2 ==

✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe/display: Move display runtime suspend to a later point (rev2)

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/xe/display: Move display runtime suspend to a later point (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144901/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim sparse failed Sparse version: v0.6.2 Fast mode used, each commit won't b

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/display: Use display-specific platform checks in intel_bw.c

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 12:35:24PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: > Add one step further into making intel_bw.c xe/i915 agnostic by using > display-specific platform checks. > > v2: > - Fix typo that resulted in converting IS_DG1(display) to > display->platform.dg2. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo

Re: [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/display: Use fixed_rr timings in modeset sequence

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 08:34:39PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 05:41:26PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote: > > During modeset enable sequence, program the fixed timings, > > and turn on the VRR Timing Generator (VRR TG) for platforms > > that always use VRR TG. > > > > Later

Re: [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/vrr: Handle joiner with vrr

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 05:41:23PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote: > Do not program transcoder registers for VRR for the secondary pipe of > the joiner. Remove check to skip VRR for joiner case. Premature. We need to figure out how to correctly sequence transcoder level stuff vs. pipe level stuff in

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/display: Use display-specific platform checks in intel_bw.c

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 07:49:08PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 12:35:24PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: > > Add one step further into making intel_bw.c xe/i915 agnostic by using > > display-specific platform checks. > > > > v2: > > - Fix typo that resulted in converting I

Re: [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/vrr: Track vrr.enable only for variable timing

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 05:41:15PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote: > Since CMRR is now disabled, use the flag vrr.enable to tracks if vrr timing > generator is used with variable timings. > > Avoid setting vrr.enable for CMRR and adjust readout to not set vrr.enable > when vmax == vmin == flipline (f

[PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/xe3lpd: Update bandwidth parameters

2025-02-17 Thread Gustavo Sousa
Bandwidth parameters for Xe3_LPD have been updated with respect to previous display releases. Encode them into xe3lpd_sa_info and use that new struct. Bspec: 68859 Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 delet

Re: [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/vrr: Always use VRR timing generator for MTL+

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 05:41:28PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote: > Currently VRR timing generator is used only when VRR is enabled by > userspace for sinks that support VRR. From MTL+ gradually move away from > the older timing generator and use VRR timing generator for both variable > and fixed tim

Re: [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/display: Use fixed_rr timings in modeset sequence

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 05:41:26PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote: > During modeset enable sequence, program the fixed timings, > and turn on the VRR Timing Generator (VRR TG) for platforms > that always use VRR TG. > > Later if vrr timings are required, vrr_enable() will switch > to the real VRR tim

✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Provide more information on display faults (rev3)

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Provide more information on display faults (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/143627/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16146 -> Patchwork_143627v3 Summa

✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Provide more information on display faults (rev3)

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Provide more information on display faults (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/143627/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim sparse failed Sparse version: v0.6.2 Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately.

Re: [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/dp: Avoid vrr compute config for HDMI sink

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 05:41:18PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote: > Currently we do not support VRR with HDMI so skip vrr compute > config step for DP with HDMI sink. > > Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 8 +++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+),

Re: [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/vrr: Prepare for fixed refresh rate timings

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 05:41:17PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote: > Currently we always compute the timings as if vrr is enabled. > With this approach the state checker becomes complicated when we > introduce fixed refresh rate mode with vrr timing generator. > > To avoid the complications, instead

✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Provide more information on display faults (rev3)

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Provide more information on display faults (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/143627/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim checkpatch failed 58ff02cb79db drm/i915: Add missing else to the if ladder in missing else fb1760bf1c2f drm/i

Re: [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/vrr: Use crtc_vtotal for vmin

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 05:41:16PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote: > To have fixed refresh rate with VRR timing generator the > guardband/pipeline full can't be programmed on the fly. So we need to > ensure that the values satisfy both the fixed and variable refresh > rates. > > Since we compute thes

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/display: Use display variable in intel_bw.c

2025-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 12:35:23PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: > Update intel_bw.c to use a "display" variable to refer to members of the > display struct. While this change does not move that file to completely > use struct intel_display as part of it's internal and public interface, > this should

✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/xe3lpd: Update bandwidth parameters (rev2)

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/xe3lpd: Update bandwidth parameters (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/11/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16146 -> Patchwork_11v2 Summary -

Re: [PATCH v8 01/14] drm: Define histogram structures exposed to user

2025-02-17 Thread Simona Vetter
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 12:08:08PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > Hi Arun, > > this whole series seems to be missing all the UAPI docs for the DRM > ReST files, e.g. drm-kms.rst. The UAPI header doc comments are not a > replacement for them, I would assume both are a requirement. > > Without the

[PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/display: Use display variable in intel_bw.c

2025-02-17 Thread Gustavo Sousa
Update intel_bw.c to use a "display" variable to refer to members of the display struct. While this change does not move that file to completely use struct intel_display as part of it's internal and public interface, this should help with a future transition. Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa --- dri

[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/i915/xe3lpd: Update bandwidth parameters

2025-02-17 Thread Gustavo Sousa
Bandwidth parameters for Xe3_LPD have been updated with respect to previous display releases. Encode them into xe3lpd_sa_info and use that new struct. Since we are touching intel_bw.c, also take the opportunity to make it use display-specific platform checkers, which is what patches #1 and #2 are

[PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/display: Use display-specific platform checks in intel_bw.c

2025-02-17 Thread Gustavo Sousa
Add one step further into making intel_bw.c xe/i915 agnostic by using display-specific platform checks. v2: - Fix typo that resulted in converting IS_DG1(display) to display->platform.dg2. Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 77 ++

Re: [PATCH v8 01/14] drm: Define histogram structures exposed to user

2025-02-17 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:08:08 +0200 Pekka Paalanen wrote: > Hi Arun, > > this whole series seems to be missing all the UAPI docs for the DRM > ReST files, e.g. drm-kms.rst. The UAPI header doc comments are not a > replacement for them, I would assume both are a requirement. > > Without the ReST

✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display: Allow display PHYs to reset power state (rev4)

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/display: Allow display PHYs to reset power state (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144102/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16143 -> Patchwork_144102v4

✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Allow display PHYs to reset power state (rev4)

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/display: Allow display PHYs to reset power state (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144102/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim checkpatch failed 39d8ced99928 drm/i915/display: Drop crtc_state from C10/C20 pll programming -:290: CHE

[PATCH v4 0/2] drm/i915/display: Allow display PHYs to reset power state

2025-02-17 Thread Mika Kahola
The dedicated display PHYs reset to a power state that blocks S0ix, increasing idle system power. After a system reset (cold boot, S3/4/5, warm reset) if a dedicated PHY is not being brought up shortly, use these steps to move the PHY to the lowest power state to save power. 1. Follow the PLL Enab

[PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915/display: Drop crtc_state from C10/C20 pll programming

2025-02-17 Thread Mika Kahola
For PLL programming for C10 and C20 we don't need to carry crtc_state but instead use only necessary parts of the crtc_state i.e. pll_state. This change is needed to PTL wa 14023648281 where we would need to otherwise pass an artificial crtc_state with majority of the struct members initialized as

[PATCH v4 2/2] drm/i915/display: Allow display PHYs to reset power state

2025-02-17 Thread Mika Kahola
The dedicated display PHYs reset to a power state that blocks S0ix, increasing idle system power. After a system reset (cold boot, S3/4/5, warm reset) if a dedicated PHY is not being brought up shortly, use these steps to move the PHY to the lowest power state to save power. 1. Follow the PLL Enab

Re: [PATCH v8 01/14] drm: Define histogram structures exposed to user

2025-02-17 Thread Pekka Paalanen
Hi Arun, this whole series seems to be missing all the UAPI docs for the DRM ReST files, e.g. drm-kms.rst. The UAPI header doc comments are not a replacement for them, I would assume both are a requirement. Without the ReST docs it is really difficult to see how this new UAPI should be used. On

RE: Regression on linux-next (next-20250210)

2025-02-17 Thread Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
> -Original Message- > From: andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com > > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 1:43 AM > To: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar > Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel- > x...@lists.freedesktop.org; Kurmi, Suresh Kumar > ; Saarinen, Jani > Su

✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Provide more information on display faults (rev2)

2025-02-17 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Provide more information on display faults (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/143627/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16142 -> Patchwork_143627v2 Summa