Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/gvt: Move mdev attribute groups into kvmgt module

2021-05-12 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2021.05.12 09:47:39 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:31:41AM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > This need to go into the vfio tree in some way, either directly > > > through it, via rc or otherwise > > > > As this is only for i915/gvt, once drm/i915 backmerge with linu

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/dp_mst: Use kHz as link rate units when settig source max link caps at init

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/dp_mst: Use kHz as link rate units when settig source max link caps at init URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90099/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10074_full -> Patchwork_20114_full

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Check HDMI sink deep color capabilities during .mode_valid() (rev2)

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Check HDMI sink deep color capabilities during .mode_valid() (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90036/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10074_full -> Patchwork_20113_full ==

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev3)

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90048/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10074_full -> Patchwork_20112_full Summary -

Re: [Intel-gfx] Tracing a "drm_mode_prune_invalid"

2021-05-12 Thread Adam Chasen
Ville, DPCD DFP: 0a What is the DPCD DFP? Additional info, this is the first time there has been an issue with this adapter not working (i.e. it must have been operating above 165MHz), but it is possible other drivers have "ignored" things and just followed the EDID. Thanks! Adam kernel: [drm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Disable HiZ Raw Stall Optimization on broken gen7

2021-05-12 Thread Dave Airlie
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie Can we get this fix in, having a regression spanning 3 kernels isn't a good look, we can work out why it matters later in life if anyone cares. Dave. On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 00:31, Simon Rettberg wrote: > > When resetting CACHE_MODE registers, don't enable HiZ Raw Stall

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2)

2021-05-12 Thread Matt Roper
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:47:26PM +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2) > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90048/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10071_full -> Patchwo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 36/48] drm/i915/adl_p: Enable/disable loadgen sharing

2021-05-12 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Matt > Roper > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 7:28 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 36/48] drm/i915/adl_p: Enable/disable loadgen > sharing > > From: Mika Kahola > > Disable loadgen sharing for DP

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4

2021-05-12 Thread Imre Deak
Hi Lakshmi, On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:23:59PM +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4 > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90102/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 44/48] drm/i915/adl_p: Add IPs stepping mapping

2021-05-12 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Matt > Roper > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 7:28 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Nikula, Jani > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 44/48] drm/i915/adl_p: Add IPs stepping > mapping > > From: José Roberto de Souza > > This wi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3.1 13/48] drm/i915/xelpd: Add rc_qp_table for rcparams calculation

2021-05-12 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 07:52:43PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: From: Vandita Kulkarni Add the qp table for 444 formats, for 8bpc, 10bpc and 12bpc, as given by the VESA C model for DSC 1.1 v2: - Add include guard to header (Jani) - Move the big tables to a .c file (Chris, Jani, Lucas) v3: - Make t

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4 URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90102/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10074 -> Patchwork_20115 Sum

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 39/48] drm/i915/bigjoiner: Mode validation with uncompressed pipe joiner

2021-05-12 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Matt > Roper > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 7:28 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 39/48] drm/i915/bigjoiner: Mode validation > with uncompressed pipe joiner > > From: Animesh Manna > > No need f

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2)

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90048/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10071_full -> Patchwork_20107_full Summary -

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/dp_mst: Use kHz as link rate units when settig source max link caps at init

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/dp_mst: Use kHz as link rate units when settig source max link caps at init URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90099/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10074 -> Patchwork_20114 ==

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/48] drm/i915/xelpd: Handle proper AUX interrupt bits

2021-05-12 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 07:27:33PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: XE_LPD has new AUX interrupt bits for DDI-D and DDI-E that take the spots that were used by TC5/TC6 on Display12 platforms. While we're at it, let's convert the bit definitions for all TGL+ aux bits over to the modern REG_BIT() notation

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reenable LTTPR non-transparent LT mode for DPCD_REV<1.4

2021-05-12 Thread Imre Deak
The driver currently disables the LTTPR non-transparent link training mode for sinks with a DPCD_REV<1.4, based on the following description of the LTTPR DPCD register range in DP standard 2.0 (at the 0xF register description): "" LTTPR-related registers at DPCD Addresses Fh through F02FFh

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/dp_mst: Use kHz as link rate units when settig source max link caps at init

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/dp_mst: Use kHz as link rate units when settig source max link caps at init URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90099/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip c9bc0648dd46 drm/dp_mst: Use kHz as link rate units when settig sour

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/dp_mst: Use kHz as link rate units when settig source max link caps at init

2021-05-12 Thread Nikola Cornij
[why] Link rate in kHz is what is eventually required to calculate the link bandwidth, which makes kHz a more generic unit. This should also make forward-compatibility with new DP standards easier. [how] - Replace 'link rate DPCD code' with 'link rate in kHz' when used with drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/1] drm/dp_mst: Use kHz as link rate units when settig source max link caps at init

2021-05-12 Thread Nikola Cornij
Change log: v2: - Added 'Acked-by' to comment v1: - Initial Nikola Cornij (1): drm/dp_mst: Use kHz as link rate units when settig source max link caps at init .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Check HDMI sink deep color capabilities during .mode_valid() (rev2)

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Check HDMI sink deep color capabilities during .mode_valid() (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90036/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10074 -> Patchwork_20113

[Intel-gfx] Tracing a "drm_mode_prune_invalid"

2021-05-12 Thread Adam Chasen
Hoping I can (help) craft a patch to address what appears to be an issue with overaggressive mode pruning. I am having trouble with rejection of a Dual-DVI compatible mode out of the DisplayPort specific to i915 in Fedora 33. It seems that drm_mode_validate_pipeline is the wall I hit when diggi

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev3)

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90048/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10074 -> Patchwork_20112 Summary ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] Tracing a "drm_mode_prune_invalid"

2021-05-12 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:31:14PM -0400, Adam Chasen wrote: > Hoping I can (help) craft a patch to address what appears to be an issue with > overaggressive mode pruning. I am having trouble with rejection of a Dual-DVI > compatible mode out of the DisplayPort specific to i915 in Fedora 33. It

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 35/48] drm/i915/adl_p: Define and use ADL-P specific DP translation tables

2021-05-12 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Matt > Roper > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 7:28 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 35/48] drm/i915/adl_p: Define and use ADL-P > specific DP translation tables > > From: Mika Kahola > > Define an

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev3)

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90048/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim sparse --fast origin/drm-tip Sparse version: v0.6.2 Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately. +drivers/gpu/drm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 15/48] drm/i915/xelpd: Provide port/phy mapping for vbt

2021-05-12 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Matt > Roper > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 7:28 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 15/48] drm/i915/xelpd: Provide port/phy > mapping for vbt > > From: José Roberto de Souza > > This will allow pro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/17] drm/i915: Fix dg1 buf trans tables

2021-05-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 04 May 2021, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > For some reason the dg1 buf trans tables have been stuffed into > icl_get_combo_buf_trans_edp() which doesn't even get called > on dg1. Split them out into a proper dg1 specific function, > and also make sure we use the proper bu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/17] drm/i915: Introduce rkl_get_combo_buf_trans()

2021-05-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Give RKL its own get_buf_trans() func. > > Note that the spec currently only lists values for DP. > Until we get that clarified let's just assume that for > HDMI and eDP we should do what TGL does (except we fall > back to the RK

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

2021-05-12 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 12.05.21 um 07:00 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: Hi all, After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c: In function 'nouveau_connector_of_detect': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c:463:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/17] drm/i915: Clean up hsw/bdw/skl/kbl buf trans funcs

2021-05-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Split the hsw/bdw/skl/kbl get_buf_trans() functions into > clean platform specific variants. One of the most obnoxious patches to review lately, but it was worth it. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 09/48] drm/i915/display/dsc: Refactor intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp

2021-05-12 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Matt > Roper > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 7:28 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 09/48] drm/i915/display/dsc: Refactor > intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp > > From: Vandita Kulkarni > > Move the platfor

Re: [Intel-gfx] New uAPI for color management proposal and feedback request

2021-05-12 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 9:04 AM Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 02:06:56PM +0200, Werner Sembach wrote: > > Hello, > > > > In addition to the existing "max bpc", and "Broadcast RGB/output_csc" drm > > properties I propose 4 new properties: > > "preferred pixel encoding", "active

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/48] drm/i915/xelpd: Increase maximum watermark lines to 255

2021-05-12 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Matt > Roper > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 7:28 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/48] drm/i915/xelpd: Increase maximum > watermark lines to 255 > > XE_LPD continues to use the same "skylake-styl

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2)

2021-05-12 Thread Vudum, Lakshminarayana
Re-reported. -Original Message- From: Roper, Matthew D Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 9:18 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Vudum, Lakshminarayana Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2) On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 06:13:10AM +,

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2)

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90048/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10071 -> Patchwork_20107 Summary ---

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2)

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90048/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10071 -> Patchwork_20107 Summary ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/40] Use ASCII subset instead of UTF-8 alternate symbols

2021-05-12 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 17:17 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Wed, 12 May 2021 10:14:44 -0400 > "Theodore Ts'o" escreveu: > > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 02:50:04PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > v2: > > > - removed EM/EN DASH conversion from this patchset; > > > > Are you stil

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/40] Use ASCII subset instead of UTF-8 alternate symbols

2021-05-12 Thread David Woodhouse
Your title 'Use ASCII subset' is now at least a bit *closer* to describing what the patches are actually doing, but it's still a bit misleading because you're only doing it for *some* characters. And the wording is still indicative of a fundamentally *misguided* motivation for doing any of this. Y

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 28/48] drm/i915: Move intel_modeset_all_pipes()

2021-05-12 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Matt > Roper > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 7:28 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 28/48] drm/i915: Move > intel_modeset_all_pipes() > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Move intel_modeset_all_pipes() to a

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2)

2021-05-12 Thread Vudum, Lakshminarayana
Matt, Gitlab is down at the moment. We have a similar bug but I need to still confirm the same. Once the gitlab is up and running I will check and if required I will a new issue and re-report the results. I will re-visit gitlab issues later today. Lakshmi. -Original Message- From: Rop

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/dmc: s/intel_csr.c/intel_dmc.c and s/intel_csr.h/intel_dmc.h

2021-05-12 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
> -Original Message- > From: Jani Nikula > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 6:38 AM > To: Srivatsa, Anusha ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/dmc: s/intel_csr.c/intel_dmc.c and > s/intel_csr.h/intel_dmc.h > > On Tue, 11 May 202

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2)

2021-05-12 Thread Matt Roper
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 06:13:10AM +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: CI pass for reviewed XeLPD / ADL-P patches (rev2) > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90048/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10071 -> Patchwork_20

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/40] Use ASCII subset instead of UTF-8 alternate symbols

2021-05-12 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 12 May 2021 10:14:44 -0400 "Theodore Ts'o" escreveu: > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 02:50:04PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > v2: > > - removed EM/EN DASH conversion from this patchset; > > Are you still thinking about doing the > > EN DASH --> "--" > EM DASH --> "---" > > conver

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 32/40] docs: gpu: Use ASCII subset instead of UTF-8 alternate symbols

2021-05-12 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
The conversion tools used during DocBook/LaTeX/Markdown->ReST conversion and some automatic rules which exists on certain text editors like LibreOffice turned ASCII characters into some UTF-8 alternatives that are better displayed on html and PDF. While it is OK to use UTF-8 characters in Linux, i

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/40] Use ASCII subset instead of UTF-8 alternate symbols

2021-05-12 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
This series contain basically a cleanup from all those years of converting files to ReST. During the conversion period, several tools like LaTeX, pandoc, DocBook and some specially-written scripts were used in order to convert existing documents. Such conversion tools - plus some text editor like

Re: [Intel-gfx] New uAPI for color management proposal and feedback request

2021-05-12 Thread Werner Sembach
Am 12.05.21 um 14:06 schrieb Werner Sembach: > Hello, > > In addition to the existing "max bpc", and "Broadcast RGB/output_csc" drm > properties I propose 4 new properties: > "preferred pixel encoding", "active color depth", "active color range", and > "active pixel encoding" > > > Motivation: >

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: split out new intel_backlight.[ch]

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: split out new intel_backlight.[ch] URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90078/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10074 -> Patchwork_20111 Summary --- **FAI

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-next

2021-05-12 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Dave and Daniel, here's the first PR for drm-misc-next for what will go into v5.14. Some noteable changes are * consistency between the plane formats and allow_fb_modifiers in UAPI, * overlay support in vkms, * proper HDR support in vc4, * SVGA3 support in vmwgfx, * many TTM fixes and a d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/40] Use ASCII subset instead of UTF-8 alternate symbols

2021-05-12 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 02:50:04PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > v2: > - removed EM/EN DASH conversion from this patchset; Are you still thinking about doing the EN DASH --> "--" EM DASH --> "---" conversion? That's not going to change what the documentation will look like in the HTML a

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: split out new intel_backlight.[ch]

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: split out new intel_backlight.[ch] URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90078/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 5c56f5e2aca2 drm/i915/backlight: extract backlight code to a separate file -:57: WARNING:FILE_PATH_CHANG

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] Rename all CSR references to DMC

2021-05-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 11 May 2021, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > Currently in our driver we use both CSR and DMC interchangeably. > Even though the spec mentions both, we do not follow that convention > in the driver. > > Renaming all references of CSR to just be DMC. This hopefully makes > the driver of this part a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/dmc: s/intel_csr.c/intel_dmc.c and s/intel_csr.h/intel_dmc.h

2021-05-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 11 May 2021, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > Finally, rename the header and source file from csr to dmc. > > Cc: Jani Nikula > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c |

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/panel: mass rename functions to have intel_panel_ prefix

2021-05-12 Thread Jani Nikula
Follow the usual naming conventions. Also pull HAS_GMCH() check to intel_panel_fitting(). No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c| 9 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/backlight: mass rename functions to have intel_backlight_ prefix

2021-05-12 Thread Jani Nikula
Follow the usual naming conventions. As a drive-by cleanup, also pass intel_connector instead of drm_connector to intel_backlight_setup(). No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/g4x_dp.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c|

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915: split out new intel_backlight.[ch]

2021-05-12 Thread Jani Nikula
Long overdue refactoring. This should not conflict with Lyude's dpcd backlight refactoring [1], but if it does, that series should have precedence. BR, Jani. [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/84754/ Jani Nikula (3): drm/i915/backlight: extract backlight code to a separate file d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/ttm, drm/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend

2021-05-12 Thread Thomas Hellström
On 5/12/21 3:05 PM, Christian König wrote: Am 12.05.21 um 15:02 schrieb Thomas Hellström: On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 09:09 +0200, Christian König wrote: Am 12.05.21 um 09:05 schrieb Thomas Hellström: On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 08:57 +0200, Christian König wrote: Am 11.05.21 um 16:28 schrieb Thomas Hel

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/gem: Pin the L-shape quirked object as unshrinkable

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gem: Pin the L-shape quirked object as unshrinkable URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90065/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10073 -> Patchwork_20110 Summary

Re: [Intel-gfx] New uAPI for color management proposal and feedback request

2021-05-12 Thread Simon Ser
On Wednesday, May 12th, 2021 at 3:04 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > Adoption: > > > > A KDE dev wants to implement the settings in the KDE settings GUI: > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/476#note_912370 > > > > Tuxedo Computers (my employer) wants to implement the settings de

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/ttm, drm/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend

2021-05-12 Thread Christian König
Am 12.05.21 um 15:02 schrieb Thomas Hellström: On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 09:09 +0200, Christian König wrote: Am 12.05.21 um 09:05 schrieb Thomas Hellström: On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 08:57 +0200, Christian König wrote: Am 11.05.21 um 16:28 schrieb Thomas Hellström: On 5/11/21 4:09 PM, Christian König

Re: [Intel-gfx] New uAPI for color management proposal and feedback request

2021-05-12 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 02:06:56PM +0200, Werner Sembach wrote: > Hello, > > In addition to the existing "max bpc", and "Broadcast RGB/output_csc" drm > properties I propose 4 new properties: > "preferred pixel encoding", "active color depth", "active color range", and > "active pixel encoding"

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/ttm, drm/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend

2021-05-12 Thread Thomas Hellström
On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 09:09 +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 12.05.21 um 09:05 schrieb Thomas Hellström: > > On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 08:57 +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > Am 11.05.21 um 16:28 schrieb Thomas Hellström: > > > > On 5/11/21 4:09 PM, Christian König wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Am 11

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Revert hardcoded lockdep values.

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: Revert hardcoded lockdep values. URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90059/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10073 -> Patchwork_20108 Summary --- **FAILURE** Se

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for i915 clear-residuals BYT + IVB rendering issue + possible fix

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: i915 clear-residuals BYT + IVB rendering issue + possible fix URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90062/ State : failure == Summary == Applying: i915 clear-residuals BYT + IVB rendering issue + possible fix error: patch failed: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/ge

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.13 i915/PAT regression on Brasswell, adding nopat to the kernel commandline worksaround this

2021-05-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 5/12/21 1:57 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> IIRC it's because of 74ffa5a3e685 ("mm: add remap_pfn_range_notrack"), >> which added a sanity check to make sure expectations were met. It turns >> out they were not. >> >> The bu

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 clear-residuals BYT + IVB rendering issue + possible fix

2021-05-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 5/12/21 2:18 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:06:23PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> We (Fedora) received a bug-report about rendering issues >> on BYT and IVB caused by the i915 clear-residuals work >> which landed in 5.10.y : >> >> The Fedora bug: >> htt

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 clear-residuals BYT + IVB rendering issue + possible fix

2021-05-12 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:06:23PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > We (Fedora) received a bug-report about rendering issues > on BYT and IVB caused by the i915 clear-residuals work > which landed in 5.10.y : > > The Fedora bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959581 > >

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Revert hardcoded lockdep values.

2021-05-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: Revert hardcoded lockdep values. URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90059/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 3e74c76de424 Revert hardcoded lockdep values. -:43: WARNING:FROM_SIGN_OFF_MISMATCH: From:/Signed-off-by: email addre

[Intel-gfx] New uAPI for color management proposal and feedback request

2021-05-12 Thread Werner Sembach
Hello, In addition to the existing "max bpc", and "Broadcast RGB/output_csc" drm properties I propose 4 new properties: "preferred pixel encoding", "active color depth", "active color range", and "active pixel encoding" Motivation: Current monitors have a variety pixel encodings available: RG

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.13 i915/PAT regression on Brasswell, adding nopat to the kernel commandline worksaround this

2021-05-12 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > IIRC it's because of 74ffa5a3e685 ("mm: add remap_pfn_range_notrack"), > which added a sanity check to make sure expectations were met. It turns > out they were not. > > The bug is not new, the warning is. AFAIK the i915 team is awa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/ttm, drm/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend

2021-05-12 Thread Thomas Hellström
Hi, Matthew, Thanks for reviewing! On 5/12/21 1:45 PM, Matthew Auld wrote: On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 14:26, Thomas Hellström wrote: Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915 gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added functionality like delayed delete

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/ttm, drm/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend

2021-05-12 Thread Matthew Auld
On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 14:26, Thomas Hellström wrote: > > Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915 > gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added > functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation. > > Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.13 i915/PAT regression on Brasswell, adding nopat to the kernel commandline worksaround this

2021-05-12 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:57:02AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm not sure if this is a i915 bug, or caused by changes elsewhere in the > kernel, > so I thought it would be best to just send out an email and then see from > there. > > With 5.13-rc1 gdm fails to show and dmesg con

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Pin the L-shape quirked object as unshrinkable

2021-05-12 Thread Matthew Auld
From: Chris Wilson When instantiating a tiled object on an L-shaped memory machine, we mark the object as unshrinkable to prevent the shrinker from trying to swap out the pages. We have to do this as we do not know the swizzling on the individual pages, and so the data will be scrambled across sw

[Intel-gfx] i915 clear-residuals BYT + IVB rendering issue + possible fix

2021-05-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, We (Fedora) received a bug-report about rendering issues on BYT and IVB caused by the i915 clear-residuals work which landed in 5.10.y : The Fedora bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959581 Points to these i915 bugs: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3071 h

[Intel-gfx] 5.13 i915/PAT regression on Brasswell, adding nopat to the kernel commandline worksaround this

2021-05-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, I'm not sure if this is a i915 bug, or caused by changes elsewhere in the kernel, so I thought it would be best to just send out an email and then see from there. With 5.13-rc1 gdm fails to show and dmesg contains: [ 38.504613] x86/PAT: Xwayland:683 map pfn RAM range req write-combini

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert hardcoded lockdep values.

2021-05-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
For CI testing, config should be updated now. Revert "lockdep: Bump MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES" This reverts commit 8733308e6c3929b28fdf4bda6b4629f094f6547d. Revert "lockdep: Up MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS" This reverts commit 39eca5b925699687a7d638a866f74e79f48f73a9. Once CI approves we can drop the above t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/modifiers: Enforce consistency between the cap an IN_FORMATS

2021-05-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 03:23:43PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's very confusing for userspace to have to deal with inconsistencies > here, and some drivers screwed this up a bit. Most just ommitted the > format list when they meant to say that only linear modifier is > allowed, but some also m

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/ttm, drm/ttm: Initialize the ttm device and memory managers.

2021-05-12 Thread Matthew Auld
On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 14:26, Thomas Hellström wrote: > > Temporarily remove the buddy allocator and related selftests > and hook up the TTM range manager for i915 regions. > > In order to support some of the mock region-related selftests, we need to > be able to initialize the TTM range-manager s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 20/97] drm/i915/guc: Introduce unified HXG messages

2021-05-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:11:40AM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > > > On 11.05.2021 17:16, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 12:13:34PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > >> From: Michal Wajdeczko > >> > >> New GuC firmware will unify format of MMIO and CTB H2G messages. > >> Introdu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Introduce 'set parallel submit' extension

2021-05-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:44:28AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 05:11:44PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 10:30:48AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > > > i915_drm.h updates for 'set parallel submit' extension. > > > > > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin > > > Cc:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/doc/rfc: drop the i915_gem_lmem.h header

2021-05-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 08:38:55AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > On 11/05/2021 18:29, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 07:28:08PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 06:03:56PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > > > > The proper headers have now landed in include/uapi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/lmem: Verify checks for lmem residency

2021-05-12 Thread Matthew Auld
On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 14:26, Thomas Hellström wrote: > > Since objects can be migrated or evicted when not pinned or locked, > update the checks for lmem residency or future residency so that > the value returned is not immediately stale. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström > --- > drivers/gpu/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/doc/rfc: drop the i915_gem_lmem.h header

2021-05-12 Thread Matthew Auld
On 11/05/2021 18:29, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 07:28:08PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 06:03:56PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: The proper headers have now landed in include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h, so we can drop i915_gem_lmem.h and instead just reference the

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Use correct downstream caps for check Src-Ctl mode for PCON (rev3)

2021-05-12 Thread Gupta, Anshuman
Pushed to drm-intel-next there was unrelated CI failures, instead rev2 was green https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89639/#rev2 Rev3 was just a rebased. Thanks for the parch. Br, Anshuman Gupta. From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Patchwork Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 9:49 PM To: Nautiyal, Ankit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/ttm, drm/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend

2021-05-12 Thread Christian König
Am 12.05.21 um 09:05 schrieb Thomas Hellström: On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 08:57 +0200, Christian König wrote: Am 11.05.21 um 16:28 schrieb Thomas Hellström: On 5/11/21 4:09 PM, Christian König wrote: Am 11.05.21 um 16:06 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): On 5/11/21 3:58 PM, Christian König wrote:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/ttm, drm/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend

2021-05-12 Thread Thomas Hellström
On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 08:57 +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 11.05.21 um 16:28 schrieb Thomas Hellström: > > > > On 5/11/21 4:09 PM, Christian König wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am 11.05.21 um 16:06 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): > > > > > > > > On 5/11/21 3:58 PM, Christian König wrote: > > >