Re: [Intel-gfx] Trouble with dell latitude E6420

2012-06-27 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:08:32 -0400, Giacomo Comes wrote: > > I have a dell latitude E6420 with Sandybridge Mobile (GT2). > Since I got it (about one year ago), it has been a nightmare to run linux on > it. > At the beginning I installed openSUSE 11.4 (kernel 2.6.37.6) and the laptop > would freez

[Intel-gfx] [dan...@ffwll.ch: [pull] drm-intel-fixes]

2012-06-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
I'm so ridiculously good at forgetting about the cc's on these pull requests ... -Daniel - Forwarded message from Daniel Vetter - Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:39:43 +0200 From: Daniel Vetter To: Dave Airlie Subject: [pull] drm-intel-fixes Message-ID: <20120627183943.GI5326@phenom.ffwll.lo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: allow PCH PWM override on IVB"

2012-06-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > This reverts commit f82cfb6bcda164ef3a66b8c3fc549b1f9bdd09ad. > > This breaks the backlight controls on my IVB asus zenbook with an eDP > panel. > > I guess the right fix would be to read this bit and use either the pch > or the cpu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: non-interruptible sleeps can't handle -EGAIN

2012-06-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:19:03AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:08:52 +0200 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > So don't return -EAGAIN, even in the case of a gpu hang. Remap it to -EIO > > instead. > > What I'd really like to see in this rather long commit message is what > exac

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: non-interruptible sleeps can't handle -EGAIN

2012-06-27 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:08:52 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > So don't return -EAGAIN, even in the case of a gpu hang. Remap it to -EIO > instead. What I'd really like to see in this rather long commit message is what exactly happens in this case that's being fixed (maybe I should know, but I don't)

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: allow PCH PWM override on IVB"

2012-06-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
This reverts commit f82cfb6bcda164ef3a66b8c3fc549b1f9bdd09ad. This breaks the backlight controls on my IVB asus zenbook with an eDP panel. I guess the right fix would be to read this bit and use either the pch or the cpu register to frob the backlight values. But that is stuff for -next. Cc: Jes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: correct IVB default sprite format

2012-06-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:10:12PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > We shouldn't hit this path anyway, but make it use the IVB sprite format > definition to avoid confusion. > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes Both patches queued for -next, thanks. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch Mobile: